http://mimbari.livejournal.com/145079.html
December 19-2011.
JUSTICE MUST BE DONE IN GUYANA NOW:
For all of those who were killed unjustly while protesting peacefully under the Jagdeo administration.
The Commissioner Of Police too, MUST be investigated by an IMPARTIAL Commission of people chosen by the commonweal to investigate his Crimes Against Humanity and fellow Guyanese, and to do so with great speed.
This is what is expected from the new political administration in office. And this is what is expected for Transparency, Fairness, Justice, and the Rule Of Law in Guyana.
We The People are watching, waiting, and expect expeditious action be taken on these matters from the Office Of The President of Guyana NOW.
Derryck S. Griffith.
Monday, December 19, 2011
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Guyana's President Donald Ramotar Cabinet Appointees-2011.
http://www.demerarawaves.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2914&catid=1
http://mimbari.livejournal.com/144583.html
December 07-2011.
Guyana's President Donald Ramotar Cabinet Appointees-2011.
The full list of ministers sworn in is as follows:
Prime Minister, Samuel Hinds
Ally Baksh - Minister Within the Ministry of Agriculture
Irfaan Ali - Minister of Housing
Dr. Frank Anthony - Minister of Culture, Youth and Sport
Robeson Benn - Minister Of Public Works
Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett - Minister of Foreign Affairs
Juan Edghill - Minister within the Ministry of Finance
Dr. Nanda Gopaul - Minister of Labour
Priya Manickchand - Minister of Education
Anil Nandlall - Attorney General and Minister of Legal Affairs
Ganga Persaud - Minister of Local Government and Regional Development
Robert Persaud - Minister of Natural Resources and Environment
Dr. Leslie Ramsammy - Minister of Agriculture
Dr. Bheri Ramsarran - Minister of Health
Clement Rohee - Minister of Home Affairs
Dr. Ashni Singh - Minister of Finance
Pauline Sukhai - Minister of Amerindian Affairs
Jennifer Webster - Minister of Human Services and Social Security
Dr. Jennifer Westford- Minister of Public Service
Norman Whittaker- Minister within the Ministry of local Government and Regional Development
FOOTNOTE:
This ethnic composition looks similar to the Jagdeo administration.
Derryck.
NYC.
http://mimbari.livejournal.com/144583.html
December 07-2011.
Guyana's President Donald Ramotar Cabinet Appointees-2011.
The full list of ministers sworn in is as follows:
Prime Minister, Samuel Hinds
Ally Baksh - Minister Within the Ministry of Agriculture
Irfaan Ali - Minister of Housing
Dr. Frank Anthony - Minister of Culture, Youth and Sport
Robeson Benn - Minister Of Public Works
Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett - Minister of Foreign Affairs
Juan Edghill - Minister within the Ministry of Finance
Dr. Nanda Gopaul - Minister of Labour
Priya Manickchand - Minister of Education
Anil Nandlall - Attorney General and Minister of Legal Affairs
Ganga Persaud - Minister of Local Government and Regional Development
Robert Persaud - Minister of Natural Resources and Environment
Dr. Leslie Ramsammy - Minister of Agriculture
Dr. Bheri Ramsarran - Minister of Health
Clement Rohee - Minister of Home Affairs
Dr. Ashni Singh - Minister of Finance
Pauline Sukhai - Minister of Amerindian Affairs
Jennifer Webster - Minister of Human Services and Social Security
Dr. Jennifer Westford- Minister of Public Service
Norman Whittaker- Minister within the Ministry of local Government and Regional Development
FOOTNOTE:
This ethnic composition looks similar to the Jagdeo administration.
Derryck.
NYC.
Thursday, December 1, 2011
GUYANA'S ELECTION RESULTS-2011:
December 01-2011.
GUYANA'S ELECTION RESULTS-2011:
The People's Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) took 49 per cent of the votes cast.
And David Granger, A Partnership for National Unity (APNU), received 41 per cent. And Mr. Donald Ramotar has won the presidency.
No party with a majority. A coalition to make 51% is necessary in order for any legislation to pass in Parliament.
Thousands stayed at home and did not vote. So if you expected a different result, you have only yourselves to blame.
GUYANA'S ELECTION RESULTS-2011:
The People's Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) took 49 per cent of the votes cast.
And David Granger, A Partnership for National Unity (APNU), received 41 per cent. And Mr. Donald Ramotar has won the presidency.
No party with a majority. A coalition to make 51% is necessary in order for any legislation to pass in Parliament.
Thousands stayed at home and did not vote. So if you expected a different result, you have only yourselves to blame.
Thursday, November 3, 2011
GUYANESE-Elections Are SERIOUS Business!
http://mimbari.livejournal.com/141471.html
November 03-2011.
GUYANESE-Elections Are SERIOUS Business!
The National Election are slated to be on November 28-2011.
Are you familiar with the Guyana National Constitution?
Are you familiar with the roles and responsibilities those elected officials that YOU will be voting for, MUST play and adhere to when holding Public Office?
Elections are SERIOUS business!
Are you ready to remove the Criminals that runs this country forever?
And are you informed enough about those who are asking for your votes, about their intentions and credibility, before you decide who is eligible to get your vote?
Derryck.
NYC
Monday, October 3, 2011
GUYANA GOLD EXPLOITATION AND BANDITRY:
http://mimbari.livejournal.com/140487.html
October 03-2011.
TO: insidestory@aljazeera.net
GUYANA GOLD EXPLOITATION AND BANDITRY:
Historically, most of those poke knockers or (gold diggers) were Blacks and the Indigenous Peoples. With political unrest, and changes in the ethnic complexion of the political party in power. This historic phenomena has changed dramatically.
Blacks cannot get the financial resources to ensure they have the wherewithal to do the necessary exploration in the gold fields. Plus the politics seem to favor certain groups, that historically were absent from that industry.
Which begs the question now.
Why is this happening? And who is now benefiting from this much needed National Resource?
The government complains that it is unable to police, fully manage, and verify that all claims are legal, and if claimants are operating within the law.
Some of these claims may be correct, but with a political administration that allows some of it's administrators to operate with impunity, and indulge in under the table exploits, and other forms of corruption. It is unlikely that any significant changes can be expected to occur to remedy this national problem.
Derryck.
Guyanese-NYC.
October 03-2011.
TO: insidestory@aljazeera.net
GUYANA GOLD EXPLOITATION AND BANDITRY:
Historically, most of those poke knockers or (gold diggers) were Blacks and the Indigenous Peoples. With political unrest, and changes in the ethnic complexion of the political party in power. This historic phenomena has changed dramatically.
Blacks cannot get the financial resources to ensure they have the wherewithal to do the necessary exploration in the gold fields. Plus the politics seem to favor certain groups, that historically were absent from that industry.
Which begs the question now.
Why is this happening? And who is now benefiting from this much needed National Resource?
The government complains that it is unable to police, fully manage, and verify that all claims are legal, and if claimants are operating within the law.
Some of these claims may be correct, but with a political administration that allows some of it's administrators to operate with impunity, and indulge in under the table exploits, and other forms of corruption. It is unlikely that any significant changes can be expected to occur to remedy this national problem.
Derryck.
Guyanese-NYC.
Monday, September 19, 2011
Serving In The Military And Upward Mobility!
September 19-2011.
Serving In The Military And Upward Mobility!
It Is All About What Level You Occupy!
In the military, your future could be great or terrible, because of the level that you occupy at any given time in the ranking system.
When I was a teenager, I loved watching ceremonial parades on Armistice Day, or the parades that the Guyana Volunteer Force had on the Queen's Birthday. And often wished to be part of that institution some day. I got my chance for the first time in the Guyana National Service in the 1970's as a Serviceman. The lowest rank in the staff member's category. This organization was par-military, formed specifically to co-op youths ages 16 and older to be pioneers.
The mission was formulated by the political party in government at that time (the P.N.C), which felt that the development of our hinterlands for population re-settlements, agricultural development, exploration, and even defense, was of paramount importance in the national agenda. This institution operated similarly to any military institution, except that the highest ranking officers were the Director General, Deputy Director General, and Asst. Director General. These positions could be equated to:
* Director General = A Brigadier
* Dep. Dir. General = Dep. Brigadier/Director General:
* Asst. Director General = Asst to the Brigadier/Director General.
We also had Camp Commanders in the ranks of Majors and Captains.
These positions depended upon the volume of personnel, and the importance in the strategic and operational value that was placed on them.
Operations/Divisions:
* Training Camps/Induction Training:
* Cotton Production Camps/fields:
* Cash Crops, Animal Husbandry;
* Special wrecking crews or defense units:
* Supply Stores/Warehousing:
Educational Preferences:
Most positions in the staff corps required some past experience/s and related qualifications. And there was also some transfers from The Guyana Defense Force personnel, to operate in specific areas of expertise, in the management of this new institution. And the internal military hierarchy and seniority procedures were expected to be followed and respected.
I recall working under the command of several individuals who may not have completed their secondary education. They often gave ridiculous instructions, shirked their responsibilities, and ignored procedures, because they felt they were entitled to certain privileges, or was superior to my rank in the system.
The political influence of the Ruling Party in government also played a major role, in appointing officers to the higher ranks too. And those who were affiliated with the party's membership was seen as special, and in most cases given preference in promotions, over other enlistment personnel or transferees.
The Pioneer Corps:
The pioneer corps was the backbone and work horse of the institution. These individuals were settled in the hinterlands, housed in billets/barrack like housing units. Males and Females were separately housed and supervised. Spent several months in those camps, worked long hours, did the prescribed military drilled according to military expectations. The planted and reaped cotton, legumes, and other cash crops, which was transported to the city for export or sale by the governmental agencies and outlets at the time.
This was very hard and sometimes back breaking toil. But they were expected to perform well under these circumstances. With supplementary sessions of political philosophy/socialism being taught to them as an impetus in keeping with the National Political Agenda. Most of these pioneers were in their teens or adolescents. And I wondered just how many fully understood the ramifications of those exercises, and responsibility.
Some died from accidents while using firearms during training. But mostly out of in-experience and some lack self-discipline too. These pioneers were expected to serve three to five years, and when released on graduation, would have acquired some basic skills that would enable most to find entry level work in the public or commercial sectors, if they chose that path. Some also chose to pursue higher education via The University Of Guyana, The Critchlow Labour College, and The Georgetown Technical Institute, upon graduation from the GNS.
Conclusion:
What I have found from my experience was that the military requires a certain kind of mentality in individuals, if you intend to make a career of it. And for those who expect to gain some skill or skills, to use after they leave that institution, may find it very difficult to do, because one is almost never in total control of his/her choices or desires.
Circumstances, needs, and institutional priorities determine who will rise to the top, who will get specific posts or positions, and who will get promoted upward.
The internal politics of the military or para-military institutions differ slightly from any civilian or governmental bureaucracy!
Derryck Griffith.
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Why Are The Candidates Afraid Of Debating Each Other?
http://mimbari.livejournal.com/126777.html
April 28-2011.
GUYANA:
Why Are The Candidates Afraid Of Debating Each Other?
This is the year 2011, in case some Guyanese are un-aware of it. And it is high time that we get our politics and politicking up to date too.
Debates between political candidates are the current expectation in most developed and Democratic societies. And this trend is gaining favor in most developing countries where it has never been practiced before. Guyana is a case in point!
However, it seems like our political candidates, or at least some of them are un-willing to make this national expectation a reality. As the national election comes closer each day, I am asking this question once again.
When are we going to get a debate or two, between the contesting candidates for our General Election this year?
Is it a question or camera fright, intellectual ineptitude, or the fear of not having anything constructive to offer Guyanese?
Whatever it is, I surely would like to have a statement from each candidate to that effect very soon!
Derryck.
NYC.
April 28-2011.
GUYANA:
Why Are The Candidates Afraid Of Debating Each Other?
This is the year 2011, in case some Guyanese are un-aware of it. And it is high time that we get our politics and politicking up to date too.
Debates between political candidates are the current expectation in most developed and Democratic societies. And this trend is gaining favor in most developing countries where it has never been practiced before. Guyana is a case in point!
However, it seems like our political candidates, or at least some of them are un-willing to make this national expectation a reality. As the national election comes closer each day, I am asking this question once again.
When are we going to get a debate or two, between the contesting candidates for our General Election this year?
Is it a question or camera fright, intellectual ineptitude, or the fear of not having anything constructive to offer Guyanese?
Whatever it is, I surely would like to have a statement from each candidate to that effect very soon!
Derryck.
NYC.
Sunday, April 17, 2011
Most Guyanese Are Not Getting Politically Involved!
http://mimbari.livejournal.com/126422.html
April 17-2011.
Most Guyanese Are Not Getting Politically Involved!
I am yet to find credible fellow Guyanese who are willing to submit to me, credible information about the social and political climate in Guyana, on a regular basis.
It seems most Guyanese at home are either not interested enough to make positive comments, advocate seriously for changes, or get involved Online or via e-mail.
This worries me dearly, because I refuse to rely mostly on the so-called Public and Private news media. And we know there is no Public and Private news media without an agenda, that allows what they feel is news worth reading or listening to.
Until all Guyanese take action, keep informed, get involved, and communicate their concerns and fears to fellow Guyanese abroad and at home Freely, Regularly, and Honestly.
They will continue to suffer in silence, and without any real help from abroad.
Derryck.
NYC.
E-mail: derryckgriffith@yahoo.com
April 17-2011.
Most Guyanese Are Not Getting Politically Involved!
I am yet to find credible fellow Guyanese who are willing to submit to me, credible information about the social and political climate in Guyana, on a regular basis.
It seems most Guyanese at home are either not interested enough to make positive comments, advocate seriously for changes, or get involved Online or via e-mail.
This worries me dearly, because I refuse to rely mostly on the so-called Public and Private news media. And we know there is no Public and Private news media without an agenda, that allows what they feel is news worth reading or listening to.
Until all Guyanese take action, keep informed, get involved, and communicate their concerns and fears to fellow Guyanese abroad and at home Freely, Regularly, and Honestly.
They will continue to suffer in silence, and without any real help from abroad.
Derryck.
NYC.
E-mail: derryckgriffith@yahoo.com
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Human Rights Report-GUYANA 2010
http://www.guyanapress.com/archives/6383
Human Rights Report-GUYANA 2010
Guyana:
APRIL 8-2011
Hillary Clinton
The Co-operative Republic of Guyana is a multiparty democracy with a population of approximately 760,000. President Bharrat Jagdeo was reelected to a second full term in 2006 elections that international observers considered generally free and fair. President Jagdeo’s People’s Progressive Party Civic (PPP/C) has been the majority party in Parliament since 1992. Security forces reported to civilian authorities.
The principal human rights abuses were complaints of unlawful killings by police, mistreatment of suspects and detainees by security forces, poor prison and jail conditions, and lengthy pretrial detention. Other problems included allegations of government corruption, including among police officials, and sexual and domestic violence against women and abuse of minors.
RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom From:
a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life
The government or its agents did not commit any politically motivated killings; however, the Police Complaints Authority (PCA) received 13 complaints of unlawful killings.
On June 7, police officers, responding to a disturbance at a high school, shot and killed 16-year-old student Kelvin Fraser. The police said Fraser was shot during a scuffle, while an eyewitness said that Fraser was fleeing the scene at the time he was shot. A post-mortem examination found that Fraser died of shock and hemorrhage from trauma caused by gunshots fired at close range. On June 28, authorities charged police officer Quancy John with the murder. He was remanded to prison, and the case was transferred to the Wales Magistrate’s Court and was pending at year’s end.
There were no known developments in the investigation by the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions in the April 2009 fatal shooting by an off-duty member of the Presidential Guard.
Murder charges remained pending against three on-duty members of the Coast Guard for the August 2009 killing of businessman Dweive Kant Ramdass. The case was set for a court hearing in early 2011.
At year’s end prison officials Kurt Corbin and Gladwin Samuels awaited trial in the High Court for a 2008 manslaughter case.
In the 2008 case of extreme violence in Lusignan in which 11 persons were killed, Mark Williams, Dwane Williams, and James Hiles awaited trial in the High Court.
In the 2008 case of extreme violence in Bartica, in which 12 persons were killed, authorities in May 2009 charged five individuals: Mark Williams, Dennis Williams, Clebert Reece, Michael Caesar, and Roger Simon. The preliminary investigation concluded, and the case was scheduled for a court hearing in early 2011.
b. Disappearance
There were no reports of politically motivated disappearances.
c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
The law prohibits such practices, however; there were reports alleging mistreatment of inmates by prison officials. There were also allegations of police abuse of suspects and detainees; however, unlike in 2009, there were no reports of torture.
During the year the PCA received 11 complaints of unnecessary use of violence. Local media reported several cases of random police brutality, arrest, and interrogation prior to investigation.
On December 9, Detective Corporal Ricardo Inniss was accused of raping a 21-year-old woman who was in custody at the Turkeyen Police Station. The woman alleged that the detective, who was on duty, threatened her with continued confinement, took her into a room, and had sex with her against her will. The woman reported the incident, and the detective was detained. No charges had been filed at year’s end.
The October 2009 case against three police officers, Sergeant Narine Lall, Constable Mohanram Dolai, and Corporal Oswald Foo, for maliciously wounding three suspects, 14-year-old Twyon Thomas, Deonarine Rafick, and Nouravie Wilfred, during a murder investigation remained pending at year’s end. The complainants did not respond to court orders to appear to testify.
The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions recommended dismissal from the Guyana Police Force (GPF) of police officer Lennox King, who allegedly sexually harassed and attempted to rape a Brazilian woman in November 2009.
In December 2009 authorities remanded police constable Gavin Holder to prison on charges of indecently assaulting a 15-year-old girl who was in police custody; authorities also charged police constable Gary Verwayne for the same offense. A court sentenced Gary Verwayne to two months’ imprisonment, while Gavin Holder’s case remained pending at year’s end.
In December 2009 authorities arrested police constable Colin Jonas and an accomplice for robbing a businessperson of cash and jewelry worth 500,000 Guyanese dollars ($2,500) at his shop in Crabwood Creek. The suspects were released on bail of 300,000 Guyanese dollars ($1,500) in December 2009, and the case remained pending at year’s end.
Prison and Detention Center Conditions
Prison and jail conditions were poor and deteriorating, particularly in police holding cells. Capacity and resource constraints were a problem. The Prison Authority reported that at the end of October, there were 2,122 prisoners in five facilities, which had a combined design capacity of 1,580. Approximately half of the prisoners were in Georgetown’s Camp Street Prison, which was designed to hold 600 inmates but held 1,060. Overcrowding was in large part due to backlogs of pretrial detainees, who constituted approximately 41 percent of the total prison population. Government medical officers visit each prison location on a monthly basis. In addition, a medical staff consisting of a medical examiner, registered nurses, and assistant nurses provide daily treatment and monitor the sick as advised by the medical doctors. There were 83 female prisoners, all at the New Amsterdam prison. There were no juveniles in custody.
Unlike in past years when all newly hired prison guards received limited human rights training from the Guyana Human Rights Association, the association was not invited to perform training during the year.
Conditions improved at the Brickdam facility lockups this year, after the facility reopened following renovations, including improved cells and bathroom facilities. Although precinct jails were intended to serve only as pretrial holding areas, some suspects were detained there as long as two years, awaiting judicial action on their cases.
There were reported cases of death in prisons due to neglect or prison official abuse. On February 5, two prisoners died following a fight at the Georgetown Prison. An investigation concluded that inmate Soloman Blackman stabbed inmate Dyal Singh. Other inmates then beat and killed Blackman. Blackman had been diagnosed by a prison psychiatrist as mentally ill but was returned to the general prison population after he showed signs of improvement following medical treatment. Following the incident, the Guyana Prison Service announced measures to keep mentally unstable inmates segregated from the general prison population until construction of a separate facility to hold them.
Prisoners and detainees had reasonable access to visitors and were permitted religious observance. Prison chaplains representing the major faiths in the country were appointed to all prison facilities. Prisoners and detainees are able to submit complaints to judicial authorities without censorship and to request investigation of credible allegations of inhumane conditions. Prisoners often circumvent procedures for submitting complaints by passing letters addressed to government officials to family members. The government investigated and monitored prison and detention center conditions. On October 1, the minister of home affairs appointed chairmen and members to the prison visiting committees of the Georgetown, Mazaruni, New Amsterdam, and Timehri prisons. These committees are required to monitor prison conditions and report findings to the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Prison Administration.
Juvenile offenders 16 years of age and older were held with the adult prison population. Juvenile offenders ages 15 and younger were held in the New Opportunity Corp (NOC), a juvenile correctional center that offered primary education, vocational training, and basic medical care. Problems at the NOC included lax security and understaffing. There were complaints that juvenile runaways, or those out of their guardians’ care, were placed with juveniles who had committed crimes leading some petty offenders to become involved in more serious criminal activity.
The Prison Authority reported that there were 83 female inmates in the women’s prison located in New Amsterdam. Due to inadequate facilities, juvenile female pretrial detainees were sometimes held with adult female pretrial detainees.
The Prison Authority offered rehabilitation programs focused on vocational training and education; however, such programs did not adequately address the needs of prisoners with substance abuse problems.
While the constitution provides for the appointment of an ombudsman who may investigate any action taken by any government department or authority in relation to the administrative functions of that department or authority, the position has been vacant since 2005. There was no indication that the government declined to permit independent monitoring of prison conditions, but there were no known monitoring visits during the year.
d. Arbitrary Arrest or Detention
The law prohibits arbitrary arrest and detention; however, during the year the PCA received 50 complaints of unlawful arrest.
Role of the Police and Security Apparatus
The GPF, which is headed by the commissioner of police and overseen by the Ministry of Home Affairs, employed 2,884 officers and is responsible for maintaining internal security. The Guyana Defence Force (GDF) duties include defending the country’s territorial integrity, assisting civil authorities to maintain law and order, and contributing to economic development. The GDF, headed by the chief of staff, consisted of approximately 2,600 troops; it falls under the purview of the Defense Board, which the president chairs.
Inadequate training, poor equipment, and acute budgetary constraints severely limited the GPF’s effectiveness. Public confidence in, and cooperation with, the police remained low. There were reports of corruption in the police force. Police force abuses may be reported to the PCA; however, the PCA does not possess an independent investigation unit. On occasion the GPF reportedly failed to respond adequately to narcotics-related violence.
The PCA received approximately 400 written and oral complaints, 230 of which were sent from the commissioner of police, primarily for police neglect of duties or misconduct in public places, unlawful arrest, illegal search, corrupt transactions, and unnecessary use of force.
As of November the GPF Office of Professional Responsibility received 186 complaints; it concluded 144 investigations, and 13 were sent to the director of public prosecutions. PCA efforts to conduct impartial and transparent assessment of the accusations it received were obstructed by staff shortages (five of eight full-time positions were filled), as well as the lack of an investigative unit. By law the police commissioner must comply with the PCA’s recommendations on complaints, but the PCA relied on the GPF to conduct investigations into complaints against its own officers. Long delays in receiving reports from the commissioner also thwarted the complaints process. Most cases involving charges against police officers were heard by lower magistrates’ courts, where specially trained police officers served as the prosecutors.
Arrest Procedures and Treatment While in Detention
An arrest requires a warrant issued by a court official, unless an officer who witnesses a crime believes there is good cause to suspect that a crime or a breach of the peace has been or will be committed. The law requires that a person arrested and held for more than 72 hours be brought before a court to be charged; authorities generally observed this requirement in practice. Bail was generally available except in cases of capital offenses and narcotics trafficking.
Although the law provides criminal detainees prompt access to a lawyer of their choice and to family members, in practice these rights sometimes were not fully respected. The state provides legal counsel for indigent persons only when such persons are charged with a capital offense. However, the Legal Aid Clinic provides legal counsel at a reduced fee in certain circumstances, as determined by the Clinic. Police routinely required permission from the senior investigating officer, who was seldom on the premises, before permitting counsel access to a client.
Lengthy pretrial detention, due primarily to judicial inefficiency, staff shortages, and cumbersome legal procedures, remained a problem. Pretrial detainees constituted 41 percent of the prison and detainee population. The average length of pretrial detention ranged from six to 18 months for those awaiting trial at a magistrate’s court and for those awaiting trial in the High Court.
e. Denial of Fair Public Trial
The law provides for an independent judiciary, and the government generally respected this provision in practice.
Delays and inefficiencies undermined judicial due process. Prisoner Justin John was taken into custody in 2003 and charged with murder; his trial was scheduled to begin in 2008, but in May 2010, he was among 23 prisoners who requested an early trial; he was freed on June 16 after the state was unable to produce witnesses in support of its case.
In May according to prison records, 132 inmates of the Georgetown Prison were scheduled to stand trial in the High Court; some had been incarcerated since 2003. Delays were caused by shortages of trained court personnel and magistrates, inadequate resources, postponements at the request of the defense or prosecution, occasional allegations of bribery, poor tracking of cases, and the slowness of police in preparing cases for trial.
Trial Procedures
Trials are public and defendants enjoy a presumption of innocence. Cases in magistrates’ courts are tried without jury. Cases involving more serious crimes are tried by jury in the High Court. Defendants can confront witnesses against them and have access to relevant government-held evidence. Defendants have the right to appeal. Trial postponements were granted routinely to both the defense and the prosecution. The law extends these rights to all citizens.
The law recognizes the right to legal counsel; however, it was limited to those who could afford to pay, except in cases involving capital crimes. Although there is no public defender system, a defendant in a murder case that reaches the High Court receives a court-appointed attorney. The Georgetown Legal Aid Clinic, with government and private support, provided advice to persons who could not afford a lawyer, particularly victims of domestic violence and violence against women.
Political Prisoners and Detainees
There were no reports of political prisoners or detainees.
The case of former GDF officer Oliver Hinckson, whose indictment in 2008 for sedition some observers claimed was politically motivated, was dismissed on June 28.
Civil Judicial Procedures and Remedies
The law provides for an independent and impartial judiciary in civil matters, and the government generally respected this provision in practice. There is access to courts to bring lawsuits seeking damages for, or cessation of, some human rights violations. The magistrates’ courts deal with both criminal and civil matters. Delays, inefficiencies, and corruption in the magistrate court system affected the ability of citizens to seek timely remedies in civil matters, and there was a large backlog of civil cases.
f. Arbitrary Interference with Privacy, Family, Home, or Correspondence
The law prohibits such actions, and the government generally respected these prohibitions in practice.
Section 2 Respect for Civil Liberties, Including:
a. Freedom of Speech and Press
The law provides for freedom of speech and of the press, and the government generally respected these rights in practice; however, the government’s monopoly on radio broadcasting continued. The government attempted to censor or restrict content; the government sought indirectly to censor the print media by controlling advertising.
On August 9, the government announced the establishment of a Web site through which procurement opportunities must be advertised. This announcement was made following the passage of legislation in the National Assembly to permit the publication of government procurement opportunities on a freely accessible Web site. Stabroek News claimed that after the announcement the Government Information Agency (GINA) placed no advertisements in Stabroek News or any other private newspapers, although some appeared in the government-run Guyana Chronicle. Another newspaper, Kaieteur News, offered the government free placements of advertisements based on the availability of space. Some attributed this pattern to a government attempt to deprive independent newspapers of advertising earnings.
Government officials used libel laws to suppress criticism, and the government closed the UN-funded Media Monitoring Unit, established in 2006 to monitor media in advance of the elections.
On July 12, President Bharrat Jagdeo filed a libel suit for 10 million Guyanese dollars ($50,000) against the publishers of the Kaieteur News; its editor in chief, Adam Harris; and columnist Frederick Kissoon. The suit stemmed from statements in a June 28 article, “King Kong sent his goons to disrupt the conference.” On July 13, the acting chief justice, Ian Chang, granted an interim injunction, restraining Kissoon, Harris, and the National Media and Publishing Company Limited, publisher of Kaieteur News, from reprinting the words or similar ones as contained in the column. The suit contends that the article contained “false and manufactured allegations” and was also “malicious, irresponsible, and inflammatory, calculated and designed to excite racial hostilities amongst the people of Guyana.” The case remained pending at year’s end.
On November 23, Minister of Agriculture Robert Persaud sued businessman and presidential hopeful Peter Ramsaroop and Property Holdings Inc. (owners of WRHM Channel 7) for 10 million Guyanese dollars ($50,000) following the broadcast of a taped television show on November 7. The minister claimed he was libeled in that broadcast. On November 23, a judge granted an injunction barring the channel and Ramsaroop from repeating the alleged libel. The minister asserted that statements on the program suggested that “he is dishonest, had committed malfeasance in public office,” and was “guilty of fraud and other kindred criminal offenses.” The case remained pending at year’s end.
On August 5, reporters Gary Eleazar from Kaieteur News; Colin Smith, editor of the Catholic Standard and local BBC correspondent; Arianna Gordon of the Guyana Times; and Victor Vanvield of Prime News were turned away from a press briefing at the Office of the President for not having a GINA pass. They were informed that they would not be allowed in without a GINA pass and that the Guyana Press Association accreditation was not acceptable. Cabinet Secretary Roger Luncheon stated that the government would not surrender accreditation to any firm or entity other than GINA.
All radio stations operating on the electromagnetic spectrum are government controlled. In October 2009 the Court of Appeal ruled that the government had an unlawful monopoly on the airwaves and that the National Frequency Management Unit was not adequately considering radio license applications. The government’s monopoly on radio broadcasting continued, limiting the expression of opposition views.
Internet Freedom
There were no government restrictions on access to the Internet or reports that the government monitored e‑mail or Internet chat rooms. Individuals and groups could engage in the peaceful expression of views via the Internet, including by e‑mail. The International Telecommunication Union reported that there were an estimated 29 Internet users per 100 inhabitants in 2009.
Academic Freedom and Cultural Events
There were no government restrictions on academic freedom or cultural events.
b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association
The law provides for freedoms of assembly and association, and the government generally respected these rights in practice.
c. Freedom of Religion
For a complete description of religious freedom, please see the 2010 International Religious Freedom Report at www.state.gov/g/drl/irf/rpt/.
d. Freedom of Movement, Internally Displaced Persons, Protection of Refugees, and Stateless Persons
The law provides for freedom of movement within the country, foreign travel, emigration, and repatriation, and the government generally respected these rights in practice.
The government cooperated with the UN Development Program Office and the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and other humanitarian organizations in providing protection and assistance to internally displaced persons, refugees, returning refugees, asylum seekers, stateless persons, and other persons of concern.
The Amerindian Act requires that the local village council grant permission for travel to Amerindian areas. In practice most persons traveled throughout these areas without a permit.
The law prohibits forced exile, and the government did not use it.
Protection of Refugees
The government has not established a system for providing protection to refugees. In practice the government did not expel or return refugees to a country where their lives or freedom would be threatened on account of their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion; however, no such cases arose during the year.
Section 3 Respect for Political Rights: The Right of Citizens to Change their Government
The law provides citizens the right to change their government peacefully, and citizens exercised this right in practice through periodic, free, and fair national elections based on universal suffrage. However, local government elections, which the law provides should be held every three years, have not been carried out since 1994. On December 2, the National Assembly passed the Local Authorities (Elections) (Amendment) Bill, which extended to December 1, 2011, the date for holding local-government elections. Political parties operated without restrictions or outside interference.
Elections and Political Participation
The most recent elections took place in 2006, when citizens voted in a generally free election to keep the PPP/C government in office. Incumbent President Bharrat Jagdeo was reelected to a five-year term. International observers, including teams from the Organization of American States, the Caribbean Community, the Carter Center, and the Commonwealth, noted isolated irregularities not sufficient to change the outcome, declared the election substantially free and fair but found that ruling party use of government resources during the campaign disadvantaged opposition parties.
On February 16, the chief justice dismissed an election petition filed in the High Court by the minority party, Alliance for Change (AFC), in which the AFC claimed that incorrect vote counting in Region 10 in the 2006 national elections had wrongly awarded a seat to the PPP/C that should have gone to the AFC. The chief justice ruled that the party had breached a mandatory procedure by not filing the affidavit of service in a timely manner. The AFC filed the document 10 months after the petition, which the chief justice ruled was too long. The case was dismissed approximately three years after it was filed.
The constitution requires that one-third of each party list of candidates be women but does not require the parties to select women for seats. There were 20 women in the 65-seat National Assembly and five women in the 21-member cabinet.
While supporters of the two major parties (the PPP/C and the People’s National Congress/Reform) were drawn largely from the Indo-Guyanese and Afro-Guyanese communities, respectively, political party leadership was more diverse. The ethnically diverse National Assembly included three indigenous members. The cabinet was also ethnically diverse, mirroring the ethnic makeup of the general population. Five of the 21 cabinet members were Afro-Guyanese, including the prime minister and the head of the presidential secretariat; there were also two Amerindian cabinet ministers.
Section 4 Official Corruption and Government Transparency
The law provides for criminal penalties for official corruption; however, there were reports alleging government corruption and complacency in enforcing these laws with respect to officials engaged in corrupt practices. The World Bank’s worldwide governance indicators reflected that government corruption was a serious problem. There was a widespread public perception of serious corruption in the government, including law enforcement and the judicial system. Low-wage public servants were easy targets for bribery. In January there were 62 GPF members before the courts charged with various crimes including robbery, simply larceny, bribery, and indecent assault.
Public officials are subject to financial disclosure laws and are required to submit information about personal assets to the Integrity Commission, but compliance was uneven and the commission had no resources for enforcement or investigations.
The law does not provide for public access to government information. Government officials were generally reluctant to provide information without approval from senior administration officials.
Section 5 Governmental Attitude Regarding International and Nongovernmental Investigation of Alleged Violations of Human Rights
A few domestic human rights groups generally operated without government restriction, investigating and publishing their findings on human rights cases. Groups at times, however, complained that government officials were uncooperative and unresponsive to their views; when they did respond, it was generally to criticize.
The constitution allows for a governmental human rights commission, but it has not been established. While the constitution provides for an Office of the Ombudsman to provide redress to government employees, the ombudsman position has been vacant since 2005.
Section 6 Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
While the constitution prohibits discrimination based on race, gender, disability, language, social status, religion, or national origin, the government did not always effectively enforce these prohibitions.
Women
Rape and incest are illegal but were neither frequently reported nor successfully prosecuted. Rape is a problem and pervasive in society. Ineffective police and prosecutors resulted in few charges and fewer convictions.
On May 24, the president signed into law a Sexual Offenses Bill that broadened the definition of rape to include spousal rape, coercion, new child-sex offenses, and the creation of offenses for vulnerable adults with a learning disability or mental disorder. Other offenses, such as indecent exposure, voyeurism, and bestiality are included; the assumption that males under the age of 14 years are incapable of sexual intercourse was abolished.
A judge has discretion to issue a sentence of any length in a rape conviction, depending upon the circumstances and severity of the act committed. The apparent norm appeared to be a sentence of five to 10 years’ imprisonment. During the year 42 persons were charged with rape and 20 were convicted (a figure that includes persons charged in preceding years). Additionally, during the year, 201 persons were charged with statutory rape and 53 were convicted (including persons charged in preceding years).
Domestic violence and violence against women, including spousal abuse, was widespread and crossed racial and socioeconomic lines. The law prohibits domestic violence and allows victims to seek prompt protection, occupation, or tenancy orders from a magistrate. Penalties for violation of protection orders include fines up to 10,000 Guyanese dollars ($500) and 12 months’ imprisonment; however, this legislation frequently was not enforced because of a lack of willingness to press charges on behalf of the victims and/or a lack of confidence in obtaining a remedy through the courts. Some victims preferred to reach a pecuniary settlement out of court. There were reports of police accepting bribes and other reports of magistrates applying inadequate sentences to convictions. Additionally, cases that appear for a violation of protective order tend to be categorized as assault cases.
According to the nongovernmental organization (NGO) Help and Shelter, the GPF refurbished police units, which are required to include domestic violence units where victims can be counseled in private. The group noted discrepancies in police training for domestic violence, with some divisions actively involved in training, while others remained unfamiliar with the basic violence protection order. The GPF reported that it had established domestic violence units in four police divisions by year’s end.
Help and Shelter handled 346 cases of abuse and violence, including child, spousal, and other domestic abuse, of which 24 were formally filed in a court. Of these, three were prosecuted and one was dismissed during the year. Investigations in the remaining 20 cases continued at year’s end.
During the year the Ministry of Labour, Human Services and Social Security established a Task Force on Violence Against Women. A representative from Help and Shelter sits on the Task Force.
Help and Shelter ran a free shelter for victims of domestic violence and operated a hotline to counsel victims with the funds it received from both private donors and the government. During the year Help and Shelter conducted 36 workshops and 132 awareness sessions in sensitizing individuals about domestic violence, reaching 4,313 individuals, and 929 were counseled for domestic abuse or violence during face-to-face counseling sessions and via the telephone hotline.
Sexual harassment is prohibited under the Prevention of Discrimination Act, which provides for monetary penalties and award of damages to victims, but its application is confined to the workplace. Harassment in schools, for instance, is not covered under the law. Any act of sexual harassment involving physical assault can also be prosecuted under relevant criminal statutes. Although reports of sexual harassment were common, there were no known prosecutions for sexual harassment under the Prevention of Discrimination Act, and charges of sexual harassment were often settled out of court.
Couples and individuals had the right to decide freely the number, spacing, and timing of their children and had the information and means to do so free from discrimination, coercion, and violence. Access to contraception and skilled attendance at delivery and in postpartum care were widely available. The UN Children’s Fund reported that 83 percent of births had a skilled attendant. The UN Population Fund reported a contraceptive prevalence rate of 34 percent. The UN Population Fund estimated the maternal mortality ratio in 2008 at 270 deaths per 100,000 live births. The Guyana Responsible Parenthood Association (GRPA), established in 1973, collaborated closely with the Ministry of Health’s Maternal and Child Health Department to lecture on safe parenthood. GRPA has offered contraceptive services at its headquarters and government clinics since the early 1980s.
Women and men had equal access to diagnostic services and treatment for sexually transmitted infections, including HIV/AIDS.
The law prohibits discrimination based on gender, but there was no legal protection against such discrimination in the workplace. Although women constituted a significant proportion of the workforce, there were credible reports that they were treated unequally as well as faced disadvantages in promotion. Job vacancy notices routinely specified that the employer sought only male or only female applicants. The Women’s Affairs Bureau of the Ministry of Labor monitored the legal rights of women, but its role was limited to employment-related services. The bureau also held seminars on leadership and gender equity issues for women throughout the country. The constitution provides for a Women and Gender Equality Commission, whose chairperson was sworn in during April.
The law protects women’s property rights in common law marriages. It entitles a woman who separates or divorces to one-half of the couple’s property if she had regular employment during the marriage and one-third of the property if she had not been employed. In practice women’s property rights were generally observed.
Children
Citizenship is derived by birth within the country’s territory or by birth to a Guyanese citizen abroad.
There were some reports of physical and sexual abuse of children. During the year Help and Shelter handled 78 cases of child abuse and nine child abuse cases were filed with the courts, of which one was committed to the High Court, two were dismissed and six were ongoing. Law enforcement officials and NGOs believed that the vast majority of child rape and criminal child abuse cases were not reported. As with cases of domestic abuse, NGOs noted reports that some police officers and magistrates could be bribed to make cases of child abuse “go away.”
The Child Care and Protection Agency, established in 2009, operated a hotline to take calls regarding suspected abuse of children. The hotline received 447 child abuse reports, involving 770 children.
The age of sexual consent is 16. Under the law anyone who has sexual relations with a girl under 16 can be found guilty of a felony and imprisoned for life. There were reports of child prostitution, although there were no indications that the country is a destination for child sex tourism.
There is no specific legal prohibition of child pornography. However, the law regulates selling, publishing, or exhibiting obscene material, defined as anything that could deprive or corrupt those open to immoral influences.
The country is not a party to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. For information on international parental child abduction, please see the Department of State’s annual report on compliance at http://travel.state.gov/abduction/resources/congressreport/congressreport_4308.html.
Anti-Semitism
The Jewish community was very small, perhaps fewer than 50 members. There were no reports of anti-Semitism.
Trafficking in Persons
For information on trafficking in persons, see the Department of State’s annual Trafficking in Persons Report at www.state.gov/g/tip.
Persons with Disabilities
The constitution mandates the state to “take legislative and other measures” designed to protect disadvantaged persons and persons with disabilities. On November 2, President Jagdeo signed the Persons with Disabilities Act, which provides for equal protection under the law. The act stipulates that the National Commission on Disabilities shall comprise 12 members appointed by the president; it charges the commission with advising the government, coordinating actions on issues affecting persons with disabilities, and addressing implementation and monitoring of the act’s provisions. Regardless, lack of appropriate infrastructure to provide access to both public and private facilities made it difficult for persons with disabilities to be employed outside their homes. The Open Door Center offered assistance and training to persons with disabilities throughout the year.
Indigenous People
According to the 2002 census, the indigenous population constituted 9 percent of the population. There were nine tribal groups, and 90 percent of indigenous communities were located in the remote interior. Their standard of living was lower than that of most citizens, and they had limited ability to participate in decisions affecting their lands, cultures, traditions, and allocation of natural resources. Indigenous communities had limited access to education and health care. All indigenous communities had primary schools, and there were 13 secondary schools with an enrollment of 5,547 in remote regions. The secondary schools had dormitories that housed approximately 1,000 to 1,700 students at government expense. Government programs trained health workers, who staffed rudimentary health facilities in most communities.
By law persons wishing to enter indigenous lands must obtain prior permission from the local village council, but most visitors traveled in these areas without a permit. Rules enacted by the village council require approval from the minister of Amerindian affairs before entering into force.
Since passage of the Amerindian Act of 2006, which took effect on December 1, the government has increased the number of communal land titles for Indigenous communities from 74 to 97, more than doubling the area from 6.5 percent of the national territory so designated to 14 percent. At year’s end 134 communities had collective land titles.
To earn cash some villages contracted with loggers, saw millers, and miners to exploit timber and other natural resources on their land. Some indigenous groups and others perceived President Jagdeo’s Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS) as another government “land grab.” The Jagdeo administration conducted consultations with several indigenous communities on the LCDS, but many observers described the sessions as one-way presentations by government officials. The government made efforts to grant land titles to indigenous communities, and these titles are to receive payments under the LCDS.
Societal Abuses, Discrimination, and Acts of Violence Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
Sodomy is punishable with a maximum sentence of life in prison. There are no laws concerning female-to-female sex.
In February 2009 police arrested several transgender persons and took them before the acting chief magistrate, who ordered levied a fine of 7,500 Guyanese dollars ($37). The magistrate told them they were “confused” about their sexuality and gender, stating “it’s a curse on the family.” Following this incident the Society Against Sexual Orientation Discrimination and four of the individuals filed a motion in the High Court against the law criminalizing cross dressing; the case remained pending at year end.
Other Societal Violence or Discrimination
Violence and discrimination against persons with HIV/AIDS were not widely reported.
Section 7 Worker Rights
a. The Right of Association
The constitution provides for the right of association and allows workers to form and join trade unions, and workers generally exercised this right in practice. However, the constitution bars military and paramilitary members from unionizing or associating with any established union. According to the Ministry of Labor, approximately 25 percent of the work force was unionized.
The law provides workers with the right to strike, and workers exercised this right in practice. Strikes may be declared illegal if the union leadership did not approve them or if they did not meet the requirements specified in collective bargaining agreements. Public employees providing essential services may strike if they provide the required one-month notice to the Ministry of Labor and leave a skeleton staff in place, although the International Labor Organization (ILO) continued to note that not all of the services deemed essential by the government were considered essential under international definitions. Arbitration is compulsory for public employees, and employees engaging in illegal strikes are subject to sanctions or imprisonment. The ILO noted that such restrictions compromised workers’ right to strike. The law defines and places limits on the retaliatory actions employers may take against strikers.
b. The Right to Organize and Bargain Collectively
Public and private sector employees possessed and exercised the right to organize and bargain collectively. Eight collective bargaining agreements were signed in the first half of the year. The ILO noted that 40 percent of workers must be covered to conclude a collective bargaining agreement; 22 percent of the workforce was covered by collective bargaining agreements. The Ministry of Labor is required to certify all collective bargaining agreements, and there were no reports that it refused to certify any specific agreement. Individual unions directly negotiate collective bargaining status.
The law prohibits antiunion discrimination by employers; however, some public-sector employee unions continued to allege antiunion discrimination by the government. The Guyana Public Service Union and the Guyana Bauxite and General Workers’ Union continued to allege antiunion discrimination by the government. Trade union worker rights continued to be violated, and the government did not effectively enforce its laws. There are no export processing zones.
c. Prohibition of Forced or Compulsory Labor
The law prohibits forced or compulsory labor; there were reports of forced child labor, mainly involving the sexual exploitation of children. In February authorities rescued a child from a forced child-prostitution situation and charged a suspect in March. The case remained pending at year’s end.
d. Prohibition of Child Labor and Minimum Age for Employment
Although the law sets minimum age requirements for employment of children, child labor in the informal sector was a problem. The law prohibits the employment of children younger than 15 with some exceptions. Technical schools may employ children age 14 provided public authority approves and supervises such work. No person under 16 may be employed at night, except under regulated circumstances. The law permits children under 16 to be employed only in enterprises in which members of the same family are also employed.
Child labor was most prevalent in family-based businesses, farming, bars and restaurants, domestic work, and street vending. Small numbers of children also performed hazardous work in the construction, logging, farming, fishing, manufacturing, and mining industries. Isolated incidents of the worst forms of child labor occurred, mainly in gold mining, prostitution, and forced labor activities. Children who worked in gold mines operated dangerous mining equipment and were exposed to hazardous chemicals.
There were also reports of sexual exploitation of children, most commonly in mining areas. Also see the Department of State’s annual Trafficking in Persons Report at f.state.gov/g/tip.
The Ministry of Labor collaborated with the Ministry of Education and the GPF to enforce child labor laws. The Ministry of Labor employed 20 labor inspectors who were charged with investigating child and exploitative labor activities; however, these were not sufficient to enforce existing laws effectively. Despite conducting approximately 4,000 worksite inspections, no fines or penalties were assessed, and no employers were charged.
e. Acceptable Conditions of Work
The public sector minimum wage is 33,207 Guyanese dollars ($165) per month, and it is applicable to both public and private sectors; however, the government set wage adjustments unilaterally for public-sector employees. Although the minimum wage is across the board, the private-sector wages/salaries are higher than that of the public sector for similar categories of workers such as clerks and drivers. The Ministry of Labor was responsible for enforcing the minimum wage, and although enforcement mechanisms exist they were not used effectively. Unorganized workers, particularly women and children in the informal sector, often were paid less than the service-sector legal minimum wage. The legal minimum wage did not provide a decent standard of living for a worker and family.
The law sets hours of employment, which vary by industry and sector. In general, work in excess of a 44‑hour workweek required an overtime payment rate. The law does not require a minimum weekly rest period but does state that a person cannot be compelled to work overtime. These standards were effectively enforced, according to the Ministry of Labor.
The law also establishes workplace safety and health standards. The Occupational Health and Safety Division of the Ministry of Labor is charged with conducting factory inspections and investigating complaints of substandard workplace conditions. Inadequate resources prevented the ministry from effectively carrying out this function. According to the Ministry of Labour, there were 24 fatal industrial accidents during the year. Fifty percent of these accidents were in the mining sector and 17 percent in the forestry sector. More than half of those who died in these sectors were 15 to 35 years of age.
The Ministry of Labor moderately enforced inspection findings; responsible employers were more likely to follow standards. Workers could not remove themselves from dangerous work situations without jeopardizing continued employment.
Human Rights Report-GUYANA 2010
Guyana:
APRIL 8-2011
Hillary Clinton
The Co-operative Republic of Guyana is a multiparty democracy with a population of approximately 760,000. President Bharrat Jagdeo was reelected to a second full term in 2006 elections that international observers considered generally free and fair. President Jagdeo’s People’s Progressive Party Civic (PPP/C) has been the majority party in Parliament since 1992. Security forces reported to civilian authorities.
The principal human rights abuses were complaints of unlawful killings by police, mistreatment of suspects and detainees by security forces, poor prison and jail conditions, and lengthy pretrial detention. Other problems included allegations of government corruption, including among police officials, and sexual and domestic violence against women and abuse of minors.
RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom From:
a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life
The government or its agents did not commit any politically motivated killings; however, the Police Complaints Authority (PCA) received 13 complaints of unlawful killings.
On June 7, police officers, responding to a disturbance at a high school, shot and killed 16-year-old student Kelvin Fraser. The police said Fraser was shot during a scuffle, while an eyewitness said that Fraser was fleeing the scene at the time he was shot. A post-mortem examination found that Fraser died of shock and hemorrhage from trauma caused by gunshots fired at close range. On June 28, authorities charged police officer Quancy John with the murder. He was remanded to prison, and the case was transferred to the Wales Magistrate’s Court and was pending at year’s end.
There were no known developments in the investigation by the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions in the April 2009 fatal shooting by an off-duty member of the Presidential Guard.
Murder charges remained pending against three on-duty members of the Coast Guard for the August 2009 killing of businessman Dweive Kant Ramdass. The case was set for a court hearing in early 2011.
At year’s end prison officials Kurt Corbin and Gladwin Samuels awaited trial in the High Court for a 2008 manslaughter case.
In the 2008 case of extreme violence in Lusignan in which 11 persons were killed, Mark Williams, Dwane Williams, and James Hiles awaited trial in the High Court.
In the 2008 case of extreme violence in Bartica, in which 12 persons were killed, authorities in May 2009 charged five individuals: Mark Williams, Dennis Williams, Clebert Reece, Michael Caesar, and Roger Simon. The preliminary investigation concluded, and the case was scheduled for a court hearing in early 2011.
b. Disappearance
There were no reports of politically motivated disappearances.
c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
The law prohibits such practices, however; there were reports alleging mistreatment of inmates by prison officials. There were also allegations of police abuse of suspects and detainees; however, unlike in 2009, there were no reports of torture.
During the year the PCA received 11 complaints of unnecessary use of violence. Local media reported several cases of random police brutality, arrest, and interrogation prior to investigation.
On December 9, Detective Corporal Ricardo Inniss was accused of raping a 21-year-old woman who was in custody at the Turkeyen Police Station. The woman alleged that the detective, who was on duty, threatened her with continued confinement, took her into a room, and had sex with her against her will. The woman reported the incident, and the detective was detained. No charges had been filed at year’s end.
The October 2009 case against three police officers, Sergeant Narine Lall, Constable Mohanram Dolai, and Corporal Oswald Foo, for maliciously wounding three suspects, 14-year-old Twyon Thomas, Deonarine Rafick, and Nouravie Wilfred, during a murder investigation remained pending at year’s end. The complainants did not respond to court orders to appear to testify.
The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions recommended dismissal from the Guyana Police Force (GPF) of police officer Lennox King, who allegedly sexually harassed and attempted to rape a Brazilian woman in November 2009.
In December 2009 authorities remanded police constable Gavin Holder to prison on charges of indecently assaulting a 15-year-old girl who was in police custody; authorities also charged police constable Gary Verwayne for the same offense. A court sentenced Gary Verwayne to two months’ imprisonment, while Gavin Holder’s case remained pending at year’s end.
In December 2009 authorities arrested police constable Colin Jonas and an accomplice for robbing a businessperson of cash and jewelry worth 500,000 Guyanese dollars ($2,500) at his shop in Crabwood Creek. The suspects were released on bail of 300,000 Guyanese dollars ($1,500) in December 2009, and the case remained pending at year’s end.
Prison and Detention Center Conditions
Prison and jail conditions were poor and deteriorating, particularly in police holding cells. Capacity and resource constraints were a problem. The Prison Authority reported that at the end of October, there were 2,122 prisoners in five facilities, which had a combined design capacity of 1,580. Approximately half of the prisoners were in Georgetown’s Camp Street Prison, which was designed to hold 600 inmates but held 1,060. Overcrowding was in large part due to backlogs of pretrial detainees, who constituted approximately 41 percent of the total prison population. Government medical officers visit each prison location on a monthly basis. In addition, a medical staff consisting of a medical examiner, registered nurses, and assistant nurses provide daily treatment and monitor the sick as advised by the medical doctors. There were 83 female prisoners, all at the New Amsterdam prison. There were no juveniles in custody.
Unlike in past years when all newly hired prison guards received limited human rights training from the Guyana Human Rights Association, the association was not invited to perform training during the year.
Conditions improved at the Brickdam facility lockups this year, after the facility reopened following renovations, including improved cells and bathroom facilities. Although precinct jails were intended to serve only as pretrial holding areas, some suspects were detained there as long as two years, awaiting judicial action on their cases.
There were reported cases of death in prisons due to neglect or prison official abuse. On February 5, two prisoners died following a fight at the Georgetown Prison. An investigation concluded that inmate Soloman Blackman stabbed inmate Dyal Singh. Other inmates then beat and killed Blackman. Blackman had been diagnosed by a prison psychiatrist as mentally ill but was returned to the general prison population after he showed signs of improvement following medical treatment. Following the incident, the Guyana Prison Service announced measures to keep mentally unstable inmates segregated from the general prison population until construction of a separate facility to hold them.
Prisoners and detainees had reasonable access to visitors and were permitted religious observance. Prison chaplains representing the major faiths in the country were appointed to all prison facilities. Prisoners and detainees are able to submit complaints to judicial authorities without censorship and to request investigation of credible allegations of inhumane conditions. Prisoners often circumvent procedures for submitting complaints by passing letters addressed to government officials to family members. The government investigated and monitored prison and detention center conditions. On October 1, the minister of home affairs appointed chairmen and members to the prison visiting committees of the Georgetown, Mazaruni, New Amsterdam, and Timehri prisons. These committees are required to monitor prison conditions and report findings to the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Prison Administration.
Juvenile offenders 16 years of age and older were held with the adult prison population. Juvenile offenders ages 15 and younger were held in the New Opportunity Corp (NOC), a juvenile correctional center that offered primary education, vocational training, and basic medical care. Problems at the NOC included lax security and understaffing. There were complaints that juvenile runaways, or those out of their guardians’ care, were placed with juveniles who had committed crimes leading some petty offenders to become involved in more serious criminal activity.
The Prison Authority reported that there were 83 female inmates in the women’s prison located in New Amsterdam. Due to inadequate facilities, juvenile female pretrial detainees were sometimes held with adult female pretrial detainees.
The Prison Authority offered rehabilitation programs focused on vocational training and education; however, such programs did not adequately address the needs of prisoners with substance abuse problems.
While the constitution provides for the appointment of an ombudsman who may investigate any action taken by any government department or authority in relation to the administrative functions of that department or authority, the position has been vacant since 2005. There was no indication that the government declined to permit independent monitoring of prison conditions, but there were no known monitoring visits during the year.
d. Arbitrary Arrest or Detention
The law prohibits arbitrary arrest and detention; however, during the year the PCA received 50 complaints of unlawful arrest.
Role of the Police and Security Apparatus
The GPF, which is headed by the commissioner of police and overseen by the Ministry of Home Affairs, employed 2,884 officers and is responsible for maintaining internal security. The Guyana Defence Force (GDF) duties include defending the country’s territorial integrity, assisting civil authorities to maintain law and order, and contributing to economic development. The GDF, headed by the chief of staff, consisted of approximately 2,600 troops; it falls under the purview of the Defense Board, which the president chairs.
Inadequate training, poor equipment, and acute budgetary constraints severely limited the GPF’s effectiveness. Public confidence in, and cooperation with, the police remained low. There were reports of corruption in the police force. Police force abuses may be reported to the PCA; however, the PCA does not possess an independent investigation unit. On occasion the GPF reportedly failed to respond adequately to narcotics-related violence.
The PCA received approximately 400 written and oral complaints, 230 of which were sent from the commissioner of police, primarily for police neglect of duties or misconduct in public places, unlawful arrest, illegal search, corrupt transactions, and unnecessary use of force.
As of November the GPF Office of Professional Responsibility received 186 complaints; it concluded 144 investigations, and 13 were sent to the director of public prosecutions. PCA efforts to conduct impartial and transparent assessment of the accusations it received were obstructed by staff shortages (five of eight full-time positions were filled), as well as the lack of an investigative unit. By law the police commissioner must comply with the PCA’s recommendations on complaints, but the PCA relied on the GPF to conduct investigations into complaints against its own officers. Long delays in receiving reports from the commissioner also thwarted the complaints process. Most cases involving charges against police officers were heard by lower magistrates’ courts, where specially trained police officers served as the prosecutors.
Arrest Procedures and Treatment While in Detention
An arrest requires a warrant issued by a court official, unless an officer who witnesses a crime believes there is good cause to suspect that a crime or a breach of the peace has been or will be committed. The law requires that a person arrested and held for more than 72 hours be brought before a court to be charged; authorities generally observed this requirement in practice. Bail was generally available except in cases of capital offenses and narcotics trafficking.
Although the law provides criminal detainees prompt access to a lawyer of their choice and to family members, in practice these rights sometimes were not fully respected. The state provides legal counsel for indigent persons only when such persons are charged with a capital offense. However, the Legal Aid Clinic provides legal counsel at a reduced fee in certain circumstances, as determined by the Clinic. Police routinely required permission from the senior investigating officer, who was seldom on the premises, before permitting counsel access to a client.
Lengthy pretrial detention, due primarily to judicial inefficiency, staff shortages, and cumbersome legal procedures, remained a problem. Pretrial detainees constituted 41 percent of the prison and detainee population. The average length of pretrial detention ranged from six to 18 months for those awaiting trial at a magistrate’s court and for those awaiting trial in the High Court.
e. Denial of Fair Public Trial
The law provides for an independent judiciary, and the government generally respected this provision in practice.
Delays and inefficiencies undermined judicial due process. Prisoner Justin John was taken into custody in 2003 and charged with murder; his trial was scheduled to begin in 2008, but in May 2010, he was among 23 prisoners who requested an early trial; he was freed on June 16 after the state was unable to produce witnesses in support of its case.
In May according to prison records, 132 inmates of the Georgetown Prison were scheduled to stand trial in the High Court; some had been incarcerated since 2003. Delays were caused by shortages of trained court personnel and magistrates, inadequate resources, postponements at the request of the defense or prosecution, occasional allegations of bribery, poor tracking of cases, and the slowness of police in preparing cases for trial.
Trial Procedures
Trials are public and defendants enjoy a presumption of innocence. Cases in magistrates’ courts are tried without jury. Cases involving more serious crimes are tried by jury in the High Court. Defendants can confront witnesses against them and have access to relevant government-held evidence. Defendants have the right to appeal. Trial postponements were granted routinely to both the defense and the prosecution. The law extends these rights to all citizens.
The law recognizes the right to legal counsel; however, it was limited to those who could afford to pay, except in cases involving capital crimes. Although there is no public defender system, a defendant in a murder case that reaches the High Court receives a court-appointed attorney. The Georgetown Legal Aid Clinic, with government and private support, provided advice to persons who could not afford a lawyer, particularly victims of domestic violence and violence against women.
Political Prisoners and Detainees
There were no reports of political prisoners or detainees.
The case of former GDF officer Oliver Hinckson, whose indictment in 2008 for sedition some observers claimed was politically motivated, was dismissed on June 28.
Civil Judicial Procedures and Remedies
The law provides for an independent and impartial judiciary in civil matters, and the government generally respected this provision in practice. There is access to courts to bring lawsuits seeking damages for, or cessation of, some human rights violations. The magistrates’ courts deal with both criminal and civil matters. Delays, inefficiencies, and corruption in the magistrate court system affected the ability of citizens to seek timely remedies in civil matters, and there was a large backlog of civil cases.
f. Arbitrary Interference with Privacy, Family, Home, or Correspondence
The law prohibits such actions, and the government generally respected these prohibitions in practice.
Section 2 Respect for Civil Liberties, Including:
a. Freedom of Speech and Press
The law provides for freedom of speech and of the press, and the government generally respected these rights in practice; however, the government’s monopoly on radio broadcasting continued. The government attempted to censor or restrict content; the government sought indirectly to censor the print media by controlling advertising.
On August 9, the government announced the establishment of a Web site through which procurement opportunities must be advertised. This announcement was made following the passage of legislation in the National Assembly to permit the publication of government procurement opportunities on a freely accessible Web site. Stabroek News claimed that after the announcement the Government Information Agency (GINA) placed no advertisements in Stabroek News or any other private newspapers, although some appeared in the government-run Guyana Chronicle. Another newspaper, Kaieteur News, offered the government free placements of advertisements based on the availability of space. Some attributed this pattern to a government attempt to deprive independent newspapers of advertising earnings.
Government officials used libel laws to suppress criticism, and the government closed the UN-funded Media Monitoring Unit, established in 2006 to monitor media in advance of the elections.
On July 12, President Bharrat Jagdeo filed a libel suit for 10 million Guyanese dollars ($50,000) against the publishers of the Kaieteur News; its editor in chief, Adam Harris; and columnist Frederick Kissoon. The suit stemmed from statements in a June 28 article, “King Kong sent his goons to disrupt the conference.” On July 13, the acting chief justice, Ian Chang, granted an interim injunction, restraining Kissoon, Harris, and the National Media and Publishing Company Limited, publisher of Kaieteur News, from reprinting the words or similar ones as contained in the column. The suit contends that the article contained “false and manufactured allegations” and was also “malicious, irresponsible, and inflammatory, calculated and designed to excite racial hostilities amongst the people of Guyana.” The case remained pending at year’s end.
On November 23, Minister of Agriculture Robert Persaud sued businessman and presidential hopeful Peter Ramsaroop and Property Holdings Inc. (owners of WRHM Channel 7) for 10 million Guyanese dollars ($50,000) following the broadcast of a taped television show on November 7. The minister claimed he was libeled in that broadcast. On November 23, a judge granted an injunction barring the channel and Ramsaroop from repeating the alleged libel. The minister asserted that statements on the program suggested that “he is dishonest, had committed malfeasance in public office,” and was “guilty of fraud and other kindred criminal offenses.” The case remained pending at year’s end.
On August 5, reporters Gary Eleazar from Kaieteur News; Colin Smith, editor of the Catholic Standard and local BBC correspondent; Arianna Gordon of the Guyana Times; and Victor Vanvield of Prime News were turned away from a press briefing at the Office of the President for not having a GINA pass. They were informed that they would not be allowed in without a GINA pass and that the Guyana Press Association accreditation was not acceptable. Cabinet Secretary Roger Luncheon stated that the government would not surrender accreditation to any firm or entity other than GINA.
All radio stations operating on the electromagnetic spectrum are government controlled. In October 2009 the Court of Appeal ruled that the government had an unlawful monopoly on the airwaves and that the National Frequency Management Unit was not adequately considering radio license applications. The government’s monopoly on radio broadcasting continued, limiting the expression of opposition views.
Internet Freedom
There were no government restrictions on access to the Internet or reports that the government monitored e‑mail or Internet chat rooms. Individuals and groups could engage in the peaceful expression of views via the Internet, including by e‑mail. The International Telecommunication Union reported that there were an estimated 29 Internet users per 100 inhabitants in 2009.
Academic Freedom and Cultural Events
There were no government restrictions on academic freedom or cultural events.
b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association
The law provides for freedoms of assembly and association, and the government generally respected these rights in practice.
c. Freedom of Religion
For a complete description of religious freedom, please see the 2010 International Religious Freedom Report at www.state.gov/g/drl/irf/rpt/.
d. Freedom of Movement, Internally Displaced Persons, Protection of Refugees, and Stateless Persons
The law provides for freedom of movement within the country, foreign travel, emigration, and repatriation, and the government generally respected these rights in practice.
The government cooperated with the UN Development Program Office and the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and other humanitarian organizations in providing protection and assistance to internally displaced persons, refugees, returning refugees, asylum seekers, stateless persons, and other persons of concern.
The Amerindian Act requires that the local village council grant permission for travel to Amerindian areas. In practice most persons traveled throughout these areas without a permit.
The law prohibits forced exile, and the government did not use it.
Protection of Refugees
The government has not established a system for providing protection to refugees. In practice the government did not expel or return refugees to a country where their lives or freedom would be threatened on account of their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion; however, no such cases arose during the year.
Section 3 Respect for Political Rights: The Right of Citizens to Change their Government
The law provides citizens the right to change their government peacefully, and citizens exercised this right in practice through periodic, free, and fair national elections based on universal suffrage. However, local government elections, which the law provides should be held every three years, have not been carried out since 1994. On December 2, the National Assembly passed the Local Authorities (Elections) (Amendment) Bill, which extended to December 1, 2011, the date for holding local-government elections. Political parties operated without restrictions or outside interference.
Elections and Political Participation
The most recent elections took place in 2006, when citizens voted in a generally free election to keep the PPP/C government in office. Incumbent President Bharrat Jagdeo was reelected to a five-year term. International observers, including teams from the Organization of American States, the Caribbean Community, the Carter Center, and the Commonwealth, noted isolated irregularities not sufficient to change the outcome, declared the election substantially free and fair but found that ruling party use of government resources during the campaign disadvantaged opposition parties.
On February 16, the chief justice dismissed an election petition filed in the High Court by the minority party, Alliance for Change (AFC), in which the AFC claimed that incorrect vote counting in Region 10 in the 2006 national elections had wrongly awarded a seat to the PPP/C that should have gone to the AFC. The chief justice ruled that the party had breached a mandatory procedure by not filing the affidavit of service in a timely manner. The AFC filed the document 10 months after the petition, which the chief justice ruled was too long. The case was dismissed approximately three years after it was filed.
The constitution requires that one-third of each party list of candidates be women but does not require the parties to select women for seats. There were 20 women in the 65-seat National Assembly and five women in the 21-member cabinet.
While supporters of the two major parties (the PPP/C and the People’s National Congress/Reform) were drawn largely from the Indo-Guyanese and Afro-Guyanese communities, respectively, political party leadership was more diverse. The ethnically diverse National Assembly included three indigenous members. The cabinet was also ethnically diverse, mirroring the ethnic makeup of the general population. Five of the 21 cabinet members were Afro-Guyanese, including the prime minister and the head of the presidential secretariat; there were also two Amerindian cabinet ministers.
Section 4 Official Corruption and Government Transparency
The law provides for criminal penalties for official corruption; however, there were reports alleging government corruption and complacency in enforcing these laws with respect to officials engaged in corrupt practices. The World Bank’s worldwide governance indicators reflected that government corruption was a serious problem. There was a widespread public perception of serious corruption in the government, including law enforcement and the judicial system. Low-wage public servants were easy targets for bribery. In January there were 62 GPF members before the courts charged with various crimes including robbery, simply larceny, bribery, and indecent assault.
Public officials are subject to financial disclosure laws and are required to submit information about personal assets to the Integrity Commission, but compliance was uneven and the commission had no resources for enforcement or investigations.
The law does not provide for public access to government information. Government officials were generally reluctant to provide information without approval from senior administration officials.
Section 5 Governmental Attitude Regarding International and Nongovernmental Investigation of Alleged Violations of Human Rights
A few domestic human rights groups generally operated without government restriction, investigating and publishing their findings on human rights cases. Groups at times, however, complained that government officials were uncooperative and unresponsive to their views; when they did respond, it was generally to criticize.
The constitution allows for a governmental human rights commission, but it has not been established. While the constitution provides for an Office of the Ombudsman to provide redress to government employees, the ombudsman position has been vacant since 2005.
Section 6 Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
While the constitution prohibits discrimination based on race, gender, disability, language, social status, religion, or national origin, the government did not always effectively enforce these prohibitions.
Women
Rape and incest are illegal but were neither frequently reported nor successfully prosecuted. Rape is a problem and pervasive in society. Ineffective police and prosecutors resulted in few charges and fewer convictions.
On May 24, the president signed into law a Sexual Offenses Bill that broadened the definition of rape to include spousal rape, coercion, new child-sex offenses, and the creation of offenses for vulnerable adults with a learning disability or mental disorder. Other offenses, such as indecent exposure, voyeurism, and bestiality are included; the assumption that males under the age of 14 years are incapable of sexual intercourse was abolished.
A judge has discretion to issue a sentence of any length in a rape conviction, depending upon the circumstances and severity of the act committed. The apparent norm appeared to be a sentence of five to 10 years’ imprisonment. During the year 42 persons were charged with rape and 20 were convicted (a figure that includes persons charged in preceding years). Additionally, during the year, 201 persons were charged with statutory rape and 53 were convicted (including persons charged in preceding years).
Domestic violence and violence against women, including spousal abuse, was widespread and crossed racial and socioeconomic lines. The law prohibits domestic violence and allows victims to seek prompt protection, occupation, or tenancy orders from a magistrate. Penalties for violation of protection orders include fines up to 10,000 Guyanese dollars ($500) and 12 months’ imprisonment; however, this legislation frequently was not enforced because of a lack of willingness to press charges on behalf of the victims and/or a lack of confidence in obtaining a remedy through the courts. Some victims preferred to reach a pecuniary settlement out of court. There were reports of police accepting bribes and other reports of magistrates applying inadequate sentences to convictions. Additionally, cases that appear for a violation of protective order tend to be categorized as assault cases.
According to the nongovernmental organization (NGO) Help and Shelter, the GPF refurbished police units, which are required to include domestic violence units where victims can be counseled in private. The group noted discrepancies in police training for domestic violence, with some divisions actively involved in training, while others remained unfamiliar with the basic violence protection order. The GPF reported that it had established domestic violence units in four police divisions by year’s end.
Help and Shelter handled 346 cases of abuse and violence, including child, spousal, and other domestic abuse, of which 24 were formally filed in a court. Of these, three were prosecuted and one was dismissed during the year. Investigations in the remaining 20 cases continued at year’s end.
During the year the Ministry of Labour, Human Services and Social Security established a Task Force on Violence Against Women. A representative from Help and Shelter sits on the Task Force.
Help and Shelter ran a free shelter for victims of domestic violence and operated a hotline to counsel victims with the funds it received from both private donors and the government. During the year Help and Shelter conducted 36 workshops and 132 awareness sessions in sensitizing individuals about domestic violence, reaching 4,313 individuals, and 929 were counseled for domestic abuse or violence during face-to-face counseling sessions and via the telephone hotline.
Sexual harassment is prohibited under the Prevention of Discrimination Act, which provides for monetary penalties and award of damages to victims, but its application is confined to the workplace. Harassment in schools, for instance, is not covered under the law. Any act of sexual harassment involving physical assault can also be prosecuted under relevant criminal statutes. Although reports of sexual harassment were common, there were no known prosecutions for sexual harassment under the Prevention of Discrimination Act, and charges of sexual harassment were often settled out of court.
Couples and individuals had the right to decide freely the number, spacing, and timing of their children and had the information and means to do so free from discrimination, coercion, and violence. Access to contraception and skilled attendance at delivery and in postpartum care were widely available. The UN Children’s Fund reported that 83 percent of births had a skilled attendant. The UN Population Fund reported a contraceptive prevalence rate of 34 percent. The UN Population Fund estimated the maternal mortality ratio in 2008 at 270 deaths per 100,000 live births. The Guyana Responsible Parenthood Association (GRPA), established in 1973, collaborated closely with the Ministry of Health’s Maternal and Child Health Department to lecture on safe parenthood. GRPA has offered contraceptive services at its headquarters and government clinics since the early 1980s.
Women and men had equal access to diagnostic services and treatment for sexually transmitted infections, including HIV/AIDS.
The law prohibits discrimination based on gender, but there was no legal protection against such discrimination in the workplace. Although women constituted a significant proportion of the workforce, there were credible reports that they were treated unequally as well as faced disadvantages in promotion. Job vacancy notices routinely specified that the employer sought only male or only female applicants. The Women’s Affairs Bureau of the Ministry of Labor monitored the legal rights of women, but its role was limited to employment-related services. The bureau also held seminars on leadership and gender equity issues for women throughout the country. The constitution provides for a Women and Gender Equality Commission, whose chairperson was sworn in during April.
The law protects women’s property rights in common law marriages. It entitles a woman who separates or divorces to one-half of the couple’s property if she had regular employment during the marriage and one-third of the property if she had not been employed. In practice women’s property rights were generally observed.
Children
Citizenship is derived by birth within the country’s territory or by birth to a Guyanese citizen abroad.
There were some reports of physical and sexual abuse of children. During the year Help and Shelter handled 78 cases of child abuse and nine child abuse cases were filed with the courts, of which one was committed to the High Court, two were dismissed and six were ongoing. Law enforcement officials and NGOs believed that the vast majority of child rape and criminal child abuse cases were not reported. As with cases of domestic abuse, NGOs noted reports that some police officers and magistrates could be bribed to make cases of child abuse “go away.”
The Child Care and Protection Agency, established in 2009, operated a hotline to take calls regarding suspected abuse of children. The hotline received 447 child abuse reports, involving 770 children.
The age of sexual consent is 16. Under the law anyone who has sexual relations with a girl under 16 can be found guilty of a felony and imprisoned for life. There were reports of child prostitution, although there were no indications that the country is a destination for child sex tourism.
There is no specific legal prohibition of child pornography. However, the law regulates selling, publishing, or exhibiting obscene material, defined as anything that could deprive or corrupt those open to immoral influences.
The country is not a party to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. For information on international parental child abduction, please see the Department of State’s annual report on compliance at http://travel.state.gov/abduction/resources/congressreport/congressreport_4308.html.
Anti-Semitism
The Jewish community was very small, perhaps fewer than 50 members. There were no reports of anti-Semitism.
Trafficking in Persons
For information on trafficking in persons, see the Department of State’s annual Trafficking in Persons Report at www.state.gov/g/tip.
Persons with Disabilities
The constitution mandates the state to “take legislative and other measures” designed to protect disadvantaged persons and persons with disabilities. On November 2, President Jagdeo signed the Persons with Disabilities Act, which provides for equal protection under the law. The act stipulates that the National Commission on Disabilities shall comprise 12 members appointed by the president; it charges the commission with advising the government, coordinating actions on issues affecting persons with disabilities, and addressing implementation and monitoring of the act’s provisions. Regardless, lack of appropriate infrastructure to provide access to both public and private facilities made it difficult for persons with disabilities to be employed outside their homes. The Open Door Center offered assistance and training to persons with disabilities throughout the year.
Indigenous People
According to the 2002 census, the indigenous population constituted 9 percent of the population. There were nine tribal groups, and 90 percent of indigenous communities were located in the remote interior. Their standard of living was lower than that of most citizens, and they had limited ability to participate in decisions affecting their lands, cultures, traditions, and allocation of natural resources. Indigenous communities had limited access to education and health care. All indigenous communities had primary schools, and there were 13 secondary schools with an enrollment of 5,547 in remote regions. The secondary schools had dormitories that housed approximately 1,000 to 1,700 students at government expense. Government programs trained health workers, who staffed rudimentary health facilities in most communities.
By law persons wishing to enter indigenous lands must obtain prior permission from the local village council, but most visitors traveled in these areas without a permit. Rules enacted by the village council require approval from the minister of Amerindian affairs before entering into force.
Since passage of the Amerindian Act of 2006, which took effect on December 1, the government has increased the number of communal land titles for Indigenous communities from 74 to 97, more than doubling the area from 6.5 percent of the national territory so designated to 14 percent. At year’s end 134 communities had collective land titles.
To earn cash some villages contracted with loggers, saw millers, and miners to exploit timber and other natural resources on their land. Some indigenous groups and others perceived President Jagdeo’s Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS) as another government “land grab.” The Jagdeo administration conducted consultations with several indigenous communities on the LCDS, but many observers described the sessions as one-way presentations by government officials. The government made efforts to grant land titles to indigenous communities, and these titles are to receive payments under the LCDS.
Societal Abuses, Discrimination, and Acts of Violence Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
Sodomy is punishable with a maximum sentence of life in prison. There are no laws concerning female-to-female sex.
In February 2009 police arrested several transgender persons and took them before the acting chief magistrate, who ordered levied a fine of 7,500 Guyanese dollars ($37). The magistrate told them they were “confused” about their sexuality and gender, stating “it’s a curse on the family.” Following this incident the Society Against Sexual Orientation Discrimination and four of the individuals filed a motion in the High Court against the law criminalizing cross dressing; the case remained pending at year end.
Other Societal Violence or Discrimination
Violence and discrimination against persons with HIV/AIDS were not widely reported.
Section 7 Worker Rights
a. The Right of Association
The constitution provides for the right of association and allows workers to form and join trade unions, and workers generally exercised this right in practice. However, the constitution bars military and paramilitary members from unionizing or associating with any established union. According to the Ministry of Labor, approximately 25 percent of the work force was unionized.
The law provides workers with the right to strike, and workers exercised this right in practice. Strikes may be declared illegal if the union leadership did not approve them or if they did not meet the requirements specified in collective bargaining agreements. Public employees providing essential services may strike if they provide the required one-month notice to the Ministry of Labor and leave a skeleton staff in place, although the International Labor Organization (ILO) continued to note that not all of the services deemed essential by the government were considered essential under international definitions. Arbitration is compulsory for public employees, and employees engaging in illegal strikes are subject to sanctions or imprisonment. The ILO noted that such restrictions compromised workers’ right to strike. The law defines and places limits on the retaliatory actions employers may take against strikers.
b. The Right to Organize and Bargain Collectively
Public and private sector employees possessed and exercised the right to organize and bargain collectively. Eight collective bargaining agreements were signed in the first half of the year. The ILO noted that 40 percent of workers must be covered to conclude a collective bargaining agreement; 22 percent of the workforce was covered by collective bargaining agreements. The Ministry of Labor is required to certify all collective bargaining agreements, and there were no reports that it refused to certify any specific agreement. Individual unions directly negotiate collective bargaining status.
The law prohibits antiunion discrimination by employers; however, some public-sector employee unions continued to allege antiunion discrimination by the government. The Guyana Public Service Union and the Guyana Bauxite and General Workers’ Union continued to allege antiunion discrimination by the government. Trade union worker rights continued to be violated, and the government did not effectively enforce its laws. There are no export processing zones.
c. Prohibition of Forced or Compulsory Labor
The law prohibits forced or compulsory labor; there were reports of forced child labor, mainly involving the sexual exploitation of children. In February authorities rescued a child from a forced child-prostitution situation and charged a suspect in March. The case remained pending at year’s end.
d. Prohibition of Child Labor and Minimum Age for Employment
Although the law sets minimum age requirements for employment of children, child labor in the informal sector was a problem. The law prohibits the employment of children younger than 15 with some exceptions. Technical schools may employ children age 14 provided public authority approves and supervises such work. No person under 16 may be employed at night, except under regulated circumstances. The law permits children under 16 to be employed only in enterprises in which members of the same family are also employed.
Child labor was most prevalent in family-based businesses, farming, bars and restaurants, domestic work, and street vending. Small numbers of children also performed hazardous work in the construction, logging, farming, fishing, manufacturing, and mining industries. Isolated incidents of the worst forms of child labor occurred, mainly in gold mining, prostitution, and forced labor activities. Children who worked in gold mines operated dangerous mining equipment and were exposed to hazardous chemicals.
There were also reports of sexual exploitation of children, most commonly in mining areas. Also see the Department of State’s annual Trafficking in Persons Report at f.state.gov/g/tip.
The Ministry of Labor collaborated with the Ministry of Education and the GPF to enforce child labor laws. The Ministry of Labor employed 20 labor inspectors who were charged with investigating child and exploitative labor activities; however, these were not sufficient to enforce existing laws effectively. Despite conducting approximately 4,000 worksite inspections, no fines or penalties were assessed, and no employers were charged.
e. Acceptable Conditions of Work
The public sector minimum wage is 33,207 Guyanese dollars ($165) per month, and it is applicable to both public and private sectors; however, the government set wage adjustments unilaterally for public-sector employees. Although the minimum wage is across the board, the private-sector wages/salaries are higher than that of the public sector for similar categories of workers such as clerks and drivers. The Ministry of Labor was responsible for enforcing the minimum wage, and although enforcement mechanisms exist they were not used effectively. Unorganized workers, particularly women and children in the informal sector, often were paid less than the service-sector legal minimum wage. The legal minimum wage did not provide a decent standard of living for a worker and family.
The law sets hours of employment, which vary by industry and sector. In general, work in excess of a 44‑hour workweek required an overtime payment rate. The law does not require a minimum weekly rest period but does state that a person cannot be compelled to work overtime. These standards were effectively enforced, according to the Ministry of Labor.
The law also establishes workplace safety and health standards. The Occupational Health and Safety Division of the Ministry of Labor is charged with conducting factory inspections and investigating complaints of substandard workplace conditions. Inadequate resources prevented the ministry from effectively carrying out this function. According to the Ministry of Labour, there were 24 fatal industrial accidents during the year. Fifty percent of these accidents were in the mining sector and 17 percent in the forestry sector. More than half of those who died in these sectors were 15 to 35 years of age.
The Ministry of Labor moderately enforced inspection findings; responsible employers were more likely to follow standards. Workers could not remove themselves from dangerous work situations without jeopardizing continued employment.
Friday, April 1, 2011
The Voting Habits Of Guyanese!
http://mimbari.livejournal.com/124635.html
April 01-2011.
The Voting Habits Of Guyanese!
Guyana's Democratic quest is still unfolding politically and socially. However, it is common in most countries where one ethnic group is in the majority, to determine the outcome (most times), at any general or national elections. This phenomena is not peculiar to Guyana alone.
Just look at Iraq currently. The majority Shia Muslims are now the ones who will be the ruling majority, after Sadaam Hussein's wilful religious, discriminatory actions, and political dictatorship for so many years. In India, the Hindu majority will always rule because the majority is Hindu, and most Hindus will vote for their own kind naturally.
Finally, when it comes to voting, most of us do so traditionally, emotionally, ethnically, and religiously. It requires very Rational and Objective thinking to allow oneself to ignore the above determinants at voting time!
How Do You Co-op Support From The Majority?
In any political climate where one ethnic or religions group dominates, it is absolutely necessary to do the following:
* Have candidates that look like or is of the ethnicity of the target group, to advocate for and on your behalf.
* Have these candidates/advocates find out or enquire into the needs of those whom they are targeting.
* Create a National Manifesto/Platform that appeals to the needs of a wide cross section of the populace/commonweal.
* And strive ardently to convince them all, that you can deliver on most of those promises if given the opportunity to do so.
Lastly, never make promises that are un-realistic to achieve, or is obviously too farfetched to be attainable.
This is the approach that aught to provide some advantage, when soliciting those who can make a difference in your victory or loss!
Derryck.
NYC.
April 01-2011.
The Voting Habits Of Guyanese!
Guyana's Democratic quest is still unfolding politically and socially. However, it is common in most countries where one ethnic group is in the majority, to determine the outcome (most times), at any general or national elections. This phenomena is not peculiar to Guyana alone.
Just look at Iraq currently. The majority Shia Muslims are now the ones who will be the ruling majority, after Sadaam Hussein's wilful religious, discriminatory actions, and political dictatorship for so many years. In India, the Hindu majority will always rule because the majority is Hindu, and most Hindus will vote for their own kind naturally.
Finally, when it comes to voting, most of us do so traditionally, emotionally, ethnically, and religiously. It requires very Rational and Objective thinking to allow oneself to ignore the above determinants at voting time!
How Do You Co-op Support From The Majority?
In any political climate where one ethnic or religions group dominates, it is absolutely necessary to do the following:
* Have candidates that look like or is of the ethnicity of the target group, to advocate for and on your behalf.
* Have these candidates/advocates find out or enquire into the needs of those whom they are targeting.
* Create a National Manifesto/Platform that appeals to the needs of a wide cross section of the populace/commonweal.
* And strive ardently to convince them all, that you can deliver on most of those promises if given the opportunity to do so.
Lastly, never make promises that are un-realistic to achieve, or is obviously too farfetched to be attainable.
This is the approach that aught to provide some advantage, when soliciting those who can make a difference in your victory or loss!
Derryck.
NYC.
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
GUYANA ELECTION WATCH NOTICE!
http://mimbari.livejournal.com/122499.html
GUYANA ELECTION WATCH!
David A Granger Is Now The PNCR Nominee For President Of Guyana!
This presidential election MUST be a turning point for our nation. We must ensure that as many people as possible get on board the advocacy campaign. Time to Get Organized, Get Fired Up, and Get Moving!
GUYANA ELECTION WATCH! http://twitter.com/BringBaka
Internet Access Throughout Guyana Is Very Limited. Not Many Can Afford A Computer, Or Access To Regular Internet Service. However, Most Guyanese Own A Cell Phone With Internet Access. Therefore, It Is Your Responsibility To Let Fellow Guyanese Internally And Abroad, KNOW What Is Happening Politically With Videos Taken On The Streets And Other Venues. Join My Twitter Page Please, And Use It To Keep Us All In Touch And Informed.
GUYANA ELECTION WATCH: Chronicling The Events, And Campaigns, Prior To, And After The Victory!
http://twitter.com/BringBaka
Guyana's Electoral System Of Governance Reform Ideas!
http://mimbari.livejournal.com/122329.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Guyana
REVOLUTIONS Are Not Won in A Single Assault, Battle, War, Or Insurrection. They Are Complete When The Entire Political, Economic, Military, Economic, And Social System Which Was Targetted For Change Is Totally Transformed Into Something Desireable To The Revolutionaries!
BE SILENT, BE COY, BE RESOLUTE, And Wait For The Moment To Act Decisively!
Derryck.
NYC.
GUYANA ELECTION WATCH!
David A Granger Is Now The PNCR Nominee For President Of Guyana!
This presidential election MUST be a turning point for our nation. We must ensure that as many people as possible get on board the advocacy campaign. Time to Get Organized, Get Fired Up, and Get Moving!
GUYANA ELECTION WATCH! http://twitter.com/BringBaka
Internet Access Throughout Guyana Is Very Limited. Not Many Can Afford A Computer, Or Access To Regular Internet Service. However, Most Guyanese Own A Cell Phone With Internet Access. Therefore, It Is Your Responsibility To Let Fellow Guyanese Internally And Abroad, KNOW What Is Happening Politically With Videos Taken On The Streets And Other Venues. Join My Twitter Page Please, And Use It To Keep Us All In Touch And Informed.
GUYANA ELECTION WATCH: Chronicling The Events, And Campaigns, Prior To, And After The Victory!
http://twitter.com/BringBaka
Guyana's Electoral System Of Governance Reform Ideas!
http://mimbari.livejournal.com/122329.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Guyana
REVOLUTIONS Are Not Won in A Single Assault, Battle, War, Or Insurrection. They Are Complete When The Entire Political, Economic, Military, Economic, And Social System Which Was Targetted For Change Is Totally Transformed Into Something Desireable To The Revolutionaries!
BE SILENT, BE COY, BE RESOLUTE, And Wait For The Moment To Act Decisively!
Derryck.
NYC.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Guyana's Electoral System Of Governance Reform Ideas!
http://mimbari.livejournal.com/122329.html
http://guyanaatthecrossroads.blogspot.com/2011/02/guyanas-electoral-system-of-governance.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Guyana
February 22-2011:
Guyana's Electoral System Of Governance Reform Ideas!
The Presidency:
Executive authority is exercised by the president, who appoints and supervises the prime minister and other ministers. The president is not directly elected; each party presenting a slate of candidates for the assembly must designate in advance a leader who will become president if that party receives the largest number of votes. The president has the authority to dissolve the parliament, but in contrast to nearly all parliamentary regimes, the Constitution of Guyana does not provide any mechanism for parliament to replace the president during his or her term of office, except in case of mental incapacity or gross constitutional violations. This makes Guyana an "assembly-independent" regime (Shugart and Carey 1992) much like Switzerland.
The Prime Minister:
Only the prime minister is required to be a member of the assembly. In practice, most other ministers also are members. Those who are not serve as non-elected members, which permits them to debate but not to vote. The president is not a member of the National Assembly but may Address it at any time or have his address read by any member he may designate a convenient time for the Assembly. Under Guyana's constitution the President is both the Head of State and Head of Government of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana.
The Legislative Branch:
Legislative power of Guyana rests in a unicameral National Assembly. In 2001 the makeup of the National Assembly was reformed. Now 25 members are elected via proportional representation from 10 Geographic Constituencies. Additionally 40 members are chosen also on the basis of proportional representation from National lists named by the political parties. The president may dissolve the assembly and call new elections at any time, but no later than 5 years from its first sitting.
CONCLUSION:
Vote Of No Confidence In The Presidency:
The National Assembly should have the authority to conduct a vote of no confidence in the presidency, if he/she deliberately interferes with Parliamentary affairs, or indulges in behavior that may be construed by the National Parliament as personal interference or coercion. And the National Parliament should have the authority under these circumstances, to call for the resignation of the President within thirty days of receipt of such resignation. If he/she refuses to acknowledge same or resign, then the parliament should have the authority to appoint the VP, or the Speaker of the House to act as the president, pending the next general election.
I also believe that the President should not have any say in the daily business of the National Assembly/Parliament. And that he/she should only have jurisdiction to dissolve the National Parliament, if they deliberately violate the National Constitution Of Guyana. In such a case, the president should make this observation public to the commonweal, of his/her intention to dissolve same, and solicit or appoint a few individuals to act as the Interim Government pending National Elections within sixty days.
Regional And General Elections:
These National Elections should be conducted on the same day. And the National Constitution should provide the Month and Day of such elections. And each county/region should have a representative from each political party or independent candidate to represent that region or county. And their names, photographs, and political party, or candidacy Must be shown on all ballots, so that voters are able to recognize who they are voting for.
And the president will have the responsibility to announce the national elections as part of his/her responsibility, at least six months before the date prescribed in the National Constitution. And the dissolution of Parliament some time before, in order to give them or anyone adequate time to declare their intent to contest, and to canvass for the Presidency, the Vice President, Regional and National Offices, but not both.
Terms In Office:
No President or Prime Minister should be allowed to serve more than two five year terms consecutively. The same applies to the Elected members of Parliament too. And these term limits can only be valid from the national electorate votes at the general elections. And these national or general elections Must be held every five years.
The Right To Vote:
The right to exercise one's franchise or vote is a human and Democratic right. And must be respected, and protected wherever it is institutionalized, and advocated for wherever it is absent too. In some countries/states, the commonweal is not obliged to do so mandatory. And this can cause certain segments of the population who usually vote a certain way, to have their candidate re-elected several times over, because of the general lack of interest, or abstaining from voting.
Therefore, in order to prevent this type of presumption from re-occurring, voting should be made MANDATORY by Legislation immediately. To ensure a more unanimous outcome at the general elections.
Candidates Electoral Debates:
I also believe that at least TWO debates should be agreed upon by all candidates involved, to be held at an agreed Public Forum, and at a convenient time agreed upon also. These debates MUST be monitored by some politically neutral person that all the candidates agree to have do so. And with live Internet, Radio, and Television coverage instantaneously. The cost of these TWO debates Must be covered by the state, as an incentive for the Democratic process, and the commonweal's information and enlightenment.
Derryck S. Griffith.
NYC.
http://guyanaatthecrossroads.blogspot.com/2011/02/guyanas-electoral-system-of-governance.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Guyana
February 22-2011:
Guyana's Electoral System Of Governance Reform Ideas!
The Presidency:
Executive authority is exercised by the president, who appoints and supervises the prime minister and other ministers. The president is not directly elected; each party presenting a slate of candidates for the assembly must designate in advance a leader who will become president if that party receives the largest number of votes. The president has the authority to dissolve the parliament, but in contrast to nearly all parliamentary regimes, the Constitution of Guyana does not provide any mechanism for parliament to replace the president during his or her term of office, except in case of mental incapacity or gross constitutional violations. This makes Guyana an "assembly-independent" regime (Shugart and Carey 1992) much like Switzerland.
The Prime Minister:
Only the prime minister is required to be a member of the assembly. In practice, most other ministers also are members. Those who are not serve as non-elected members, which permits them to debate but not to vote. The president is not a member of the National Assembly but may Address it at any time or have his address read by any member he may designate a convenient time for the Assembly. Under Guyana's constitution the President is both the Head of State and Head of Government of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana.
The Legislative Branch:
Legislative power of Guyana rests in a unicameral National Assembly. In 2001 the makeup of the National Assembly was reformed. Now 25 members are elected via proportional representation from 10 Geographic Constituencies. Additionally 40 members are chosen also on the basis of proportional representation from National lists named by the political parties. The president may dissolve the assembly and call new elections at any time, but no later than 5 years from its first sitting.
CONCLUSION:
Vote Of No Confidence In The Presidency:
The National Assembly should have the authority to conduct a vote of no confidence in the presidency, if he/she deliberately interferes with Parliamentary affairs, or indulges in behavior that may be construed by the National Parliament as personal interference or coercion. And the National Parliament should have the authority under these circumstances, to call for the resignation of the President within thirty days of receipt of such resignation. If he/she refuses to acknowledge same or resign, then the parliament should have the authority to appoint the VP, or the Speaker of the House to act as the president, pending the next general election.
I also believe that the President should not have any say in the daily business of the National Assembly/Parliament. And that he/she should only have jurisdiction to dissolve the National Parliament, if they deliberately violate the National Constitution Of Guyana. In such a case, the president should make this observation public to the commonweal, of his/her intention to dissolve same, and solicit or appoint a few individuals to act as the Interim Government pending National Elections within sixty days.
Regional And General Elections:
These National Elections should be conducted on the same day. And the National Constitution should provide the Month and Day of such elections. And each county/region should have a representative from each political party or independent candidate to represent that region or county. And their names, photographs, and political party, or candidacy Must be shown on all ballots, so that voters are able to recognize who they are voting for.
And the president will have the responsibility to announce the national elections as part of his/her responsibility, at least six months before the date prescribed in the National Constitution. And the dissolution of Parliament some time before, in order to give them or anyone adequate time to declare their intent to contest, and to canvass for the Presidency, the Vice President, Regional and National Offices, but not both.
Terms In Office:
No President or Prime Minister should be allowed to serve more than two five year terms consecutively. The same applies to the Elected members of Parliament too. And these term limits can only be valid from the national electorate votes at the general elections. And these national or general elections Must be held every five years.
The Right To Vote:
The right to exercise one's franchise or vote is a human and Democratic right. And must be respected, and protected wherever it is institutionalized, and advocated for wherever it is absent too. In some countries/states, the commonweal is not obliged to do so mandatory. And this can cause certain segments of the population who usually vote a certain way, to have their candidate re-elected several times over, because of the general lack of interest, or abstaining from voting.
Therefore, in order to prevent this type of presumption from re-occurring, voting should be made MANDATORY by Legislation immediately. To ensure a more unanimous outcome at the general elections.
Candidates Electoral Debates:
I also believe that at least TWO debates should be agreed upon by all candidates involved, to be held at an agreed Public Forum, and at a convenient time agreed upon also. These debates MUST be monitored by some politically neutral person that all the candidates agree to have do so. And with live Internet, Radio, and Television coverage instantaneously. The cost of these TWO debates Must be covered by the state, as an incentive for the Democratic process, and the commonweal's information and enlightenment.
Derryck S. Griffith.
NYC.
Monday, February 7, 2011
The Right To Bear Arms Or Form Neighborhood Watch Groups:
February 07-2011.
The Right To Bear Arms Or Form Neighborhood Watch Groups:
GUYANA:
We have been experiencing a dramatic rise in criminal activities, murder, rape, and other brutal incidences within our communities.
Hitherto, we expected the Police to respond to calls promptly, pursue suspects expeditiously, and subsequently bring them to Justice. But this traditional responsibility of our institutionalized Police Force has waned to the point of a total lack of Police Protection PERIOD.
The Police in recent decades have been used by the political administration in power to rig elections, kill opponents, kill escaped prisoners of all persuasions, and used for Internal Oppression by the state.
So what is the solution?
Several applicable solutions are listed hereunder:
a. Organize Neighborhood Watch Groups to protect one's immediate environment.
b. These can be residents who are willing to volunteer time to keep watch during the night. And report any abnormal activity, or trouble seeking stranger/s in the neighborhood, or even apprehend and hold any criminal, terrorist, or individual who is hell bent on disturbing the peace in that neighborhood, until the police arrives.
b. Of course, these Neighborhood Watch groups MUST work in co-operation with the Police Station in their neighborhoods, get the necessary approval, advice, and emergency mobile radios, to keep when on neighborhood duty.
c. This idea can be discussed with the City Police departments, and/with the approval of the Ministry/Minister Of Home Affairs too.
All of the above ideas MUST be considered in order to assist our local Police, and help us all be safe in our Homes, Neighborhoods, and Public spaces.
Derryck.
NYC.
The Right To Bear Arms Or Form Neighborhood Watch Groups:
GUYANA:
We have been experiencing a dramatic rise in criminal activities, murder, rape, and other brutal incidences within our communities.
Hitherto, we expected the Police to respond to calls promptly, pursue suspects expeditiously, and subsequently bring them to Justice. But this traditional responsibility of our institutionalized Police Force has waned to the point of a total lack of Police Protection PERIOD.
The Police in recent decades have been used by the political administration in power to rig elections, kill opponents, kill escaped prisoners of all persuasions, and used for Internal Oppression by the state.
So what is the solution?
Several applicable solutions are listed hereunder:
a. Organize Neighborhood Watch Groups to protect one's immediate environment.
b. These can be residents who are willing to volunteer time to keep watch during the night. And report any abnormal activity, or trouble seeking stranger/s in the neighborhood, or even apprehend and hold any criminal, terrorist, or individual who is hell bent on disturbing the peace in that neighborhood, until the police arrives.
b. Of course, these Neighborhood Watch groups MUST work in co-operation with the Police Station in their neighborhoods, get the necessary approval, advice, and emergency mobile radios, to keep when on neighborhood duty.
c. This idea can be discussed with the City Police departments, and/with the approval of the Ministry/Minister Of Home Affairs too.
All of the above ideas MUST be considered in order to assist our local Police, and help us all be safe in our Homes, Neighborhoods, and Public spaces.
Derryck.
NYC.
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Guyana Govt Sabotage Int’l Year Of African People!
http://mimbari.livejournal.com/118809.html
January 19-2011:
Guyana Govt Sabotage Int’l Year Of African People!
ATTENTION:
Incidentally, Guyanese of African descent are not AFRICANS (per se). So let this be clearly spelled out for those who use this description for political reasons.
Secondly, Afro-Guyanese is a term coined during the quest in the 1960's and subsequently, for people of African descent, or Blacks, to understand their place, and reality as an ethnic group, who invariably were relegated to the lowest round of the economic ladder in most countries where they are people of African descent. The USA is a case in point.
So what the Jagdeo administration seem to be doing is not new to us Blacks or Guyanese of African descent. It may serve the Jagdeo administration's interest currently to do so. But with time the pendulum will surely shift.
We have suffered as a people for decades, in fact, centuries. But we have eventually prevailed.
Finally, no one can speak for Blacks anywhere, but Blacks themselves. Many have tried to label us, to categorize us, to remake our history, and to make us feel we are inferior. But our collective history and record proves them all wrong. We understand their fears, envy, and inferiority of us as a people.
They are compelled to, by virtue of their actions in the past towards us. And they probably feel that there will come a time when they will pay dearly for those wicked things they did to us as a people.
Black people everywhere MUST stand up for their collective rights, demand respect, Civil and Human Rights like everybody else does. Until we do so collectively, those that strive to divide us will succeed.
Derryck.
NYC.
January 19-2011:
Guyana Govt Sabotage Int’l Year Of African People!
ATTENTION:
Incidentally, Guyanese of African descent are not AFRICANS (per se). So let this be clearly spelled out for those who use this description for political reasons.
Secondly, Afro-Guyanese is a term coined during the quest in the 1960's and subsequently, for people of African descent, or Blacks, to understand their place, and reality as an ethnic group, who invariably were relegated to the lowest round of the economic ladder in most countries where they are people of African descent. The USA is a case in point.
So what the Jagdeo administration seem to be doing is not new to us Blacks or Guyanese of African descent. It may serve the Jagdeo administration's interest currently to do so. But with time the pendulum will surely shift.
We have suffered as a people for decades, in fact, centuries. But we have eventually prevailed.
Finally, no one can speak for Blacks anywhere, but Blacks themselves. Many have tried to label us, to categorize us, to remake our history, and to make us feel we are inferior. But our collective history and record proves them all wrong. We understand their fears, envy, and inferiority of us as a people.
They are compelled to, by virtue of their actions in the past towards us. And they probably feel that there will come a time when they will pay dearly for those wicked things they did to us as a people.
Black people everywhere MUST stand up for their collective rights, demand respect, Civil and Human Rights like everybody else does. Until we do so collectively, those that strive to divide us will succeed.
Derryck.
NYC.
Sunday, January 16, 2011
Holding Our Political Leadership Accountable After The National Election!
http://mimbari.livejournal.com/118760.html
January 16-2011:
Holding Our Political Leadership Accountable After The National Election!
Guyanese, it is time you get the message. And that message is the following.
* Whoever wins the general election this year 2011, (and I hope it is Brigadier David A. Granger), has to acknowledge that he is beholden to all Guyanese.
* That he is employed by all Guyanese, and his salary, and those of his administrators will be paid by Guyanese tax payers.
* And that we do not want any re-treads, or any of those individuals who was a part of the Burhnam, Jagan, and Baldeo legacy within the new political administration (PERIOD).
* And that we (Guyanese) at home and abroad will be monitoring all that they do from day one. And will be informing (the Administration), and ourselves about methods, and actions to be used if and when necessary, to ensure that our collective wishes are met.
These are our expectations going forward in the future after the general election is concluded, and the new administration is sworn into office.
FURTHERMORE, No one will be excluded from our engagement, observation, accountability, and transparency either.
We also need the new administration to work towards the provision of Fibre Optic Internet Access for all Guyanese throughout the length and breadth of Guyana. Because most Guyanese do not have access to the Internet, or cannot afford access to it.
Resulting in them being mis-informed, mislead, and specially targeted by the political administration in office currently. By virtue of their political control, coercion, and influence of the local media.
This cannot be tolerated in any Democratic society, or any society that believes in TRUE Democracy, that purports to ensure there is Freedom Of Speech, via All media outlets, Freedom Of Expression on the Streets, Press, Internet, Radio, and Television.
This is our Resolve and Expectation going forward henceforth!
Derryck S. Griffith.
Guyanese.
NYC.
January 16-2011:
Holding Our Political Leadership Accountable After The National Election!
Guyanese, it is time you get the message. And that message is the following.
* Whoever wins the general election this year 2011, (and I hope it is Brigadier David A. Granger), has to acknowledge that he is beholden to all Guyanese.
* That he is employed by all Guyanese, and his salary, and those of his administrators will be paid by Guyanese tax payers.
* And that we do not want any re-treads, or any of those individuals who was a part of the Burhnam, Jagan, and Baldeo legacy within the new political administration (PERIOD).
* And that we (Guyanese) at home and abroad will be monitoring all that they do from day one. And will be informing (the Administration), and ourselves about methods, and actions to be used if and when necessary, to ensure that our collective wishes are met.
These are our expectations going forward in the future after the general election is concluded, and the new administration is sworn into office.
FURTHERMORE, No one will be excluded from our engagement, observation, accountability, and transparency either.
We also need the new administration to work towards the provision of Fibre Optic Internet Access for all Guyanese throughout the length and breadth of Guyana. Because most Guyanese do not have access to the Internet, or cannot afford access to it.
Resulting in them being mis-informed, mislead, and specially targeted by the political administration in office currently. By virtue of their political control, coercion, and influence of the local media.
This cannot be tolerated in any Democratic society, or any society that believes in TRUE Democracy, that purports to ensure there is Freedom Of Speech, via All media outlets, Freedom Of Expression on the Streets, Press, Internet, Radio, and Television.
This is our Resolve and Expectation going forward henceforth!
Derryck S. Griffith.
Guyanese.
NYC.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)